Wrongful death is a type of legal claim or cause of action against a person who can be held liable for a death.[1] The claim is brought in a civil action, usually by close relatives, as authorized by statute. In wrongful death cases, survivors are compensated for the harm and losses they have suffered after losing a loved one.

Types of wrongful death claims

edit

Any fatality caused by the wrongful acts of another may result in a wrongful death claim. Wrongful death claims are often based upon death resulting from negligence, for example following a motor vehicle accident caused by another driver, a dangerous roadway or defective vehicle, product liability, and medical malpractice.[2] Dangerous roadway claims result from deaths caused in whole or in part by the condition of the roadway.

Common law jurisdictions

edit

In most common law jurisdictions, there was no common law right to recover civil damages for the wrongful death of a person.[3] Under common law, a dead person cannot bring a suit (under the maxim actio personalis moritur cum persona), and this created an anomaly in which activities that resulted in a person's injury would result in civil sanction, but activities that resulted in a person's death would not. Some jurisdictions recognized a common law right of recovery for wrongful death,[4] reasoning that "there is no present public policy against allowing recovery for wrongful death."[5] In other jurisdictions the cause of action did not exist until the passage of a wrongful death statute.[6]

Jurisdictions that recognize the common law right to recovery for wrongful death have used the right to fill in gaps in statutes or to apply common law principles to decisions.[7] Many jurisdictions enacted statutes to create a right to such recovery.[8] The issue of liability will be determined by the tort law of a given state or nation.

It may be possible for a family to seek retribution against someone who kills or is accused of killing a family member through tort rather than a criminal prosecution, which has a higher burden of proof. However, the two actions are not mutually exclusive; a person may be prosecuted criminally for causing a person's death (whether in the form of murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, or some other theory) and that person can also be sued civilly in a wrongful death action (as in the O.J. Simpson murder case).[9]

Australia

edit

In Australia, the standard of proof in a wrongful death action is 'on the balance of probabilities'.[10]

To an extent, people can protect themselves from wrongful death lawsuits by having the participants sign a waiver.[11]

United States

edit

"Wrongful death" is a cause of action, or type of claim, that can be brought when one person or entity wrongfully causes someone's death. It allows a lawsuit to be filed even though the person who was harmed is no longer alive to bring the case. Each state has its own wrongful death statute and, although the details of the statutes vary significantly from state to state, the roots of most can be traced back to Lord Campbell's Act, passed by the United Kingdom's Parliament in 1846.[12] In some states, the family of the decedent must bring two different types of claims: a "wrongful death" claim to recover the "full value of the life" of the deceased, and a survival claim on behalf of the decedent's estate to recover for funeral expenses, pain and suffering, or punitive damages.

The standard of proof in the United States is typically preponderance of the evidence[13] as opposed to clear and convincing or beyond a reasonable doubt.

Each state has different laws regarding wrongful death claims.[14] In most states, the statute of limitations (time limit to file a case) varies according to how the death occurred. For example, in Oregon, many wrongful death claims are subject to a three-year statute of limitations - but there are many exceptions, including: when alcohol is involved, when a public body is involved, or in product liability claims.

One of the most difficult wrongful death issues — and a particularly poignant illustration of how wrongful death expands liability beyond what was available at common law — is whether a wrongful death claim can be founded upon intentional infliction of emotional distress that caused the decedent to commit suicide. The first jurisdiction to allow such a claim was California in 1960,[15] followed by Mississippi,[16] New Hampshire,[17] and Wyoming.[18]

United Kingdom

edit

In the United Kingdom, liability for causing a wrongful death was initially codified into legislation by the Fatal Accidents Act 1846 (Lord Campbell's Act).[19] The burden of proof in a wrongful death action is 'on the balance of probabilities'.[10]

Liability is now to be had via the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.[20]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "Wrongful death action". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved 7 June 2017.
  2. ^ Gross, Bruce (Spring 2005). "Death throes: professional liability after client suicide". Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association: 34. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  3. ^ 22A Am. Jur. 2d Death § 1.
  4. ^ Smedley, T.A. (June 1960). "Wrongful Death—Bases of the Common Law Rules". Vanderbilt Law Review. 13 (3): 605–624. Retrieved 10 December 2022.
  5. ^ Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 90 S.Ct. 1772 (1970).
  6. ^ Williams, Robert A. "Johnson v. University Hospitals of Cleveland: Public Policy over Traditional Principles" (PDF). Akron Law Review. 23 (3): 599. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 September 2015.
  7. ^ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 925 (1979).
  8. ^ 22A Am. Jur. 2d Death § 3.
  9. ^ Ayres, B. Drummond (11 February 1997). "Jury Decides Simpson Must Pay $25 Million in Punitive Award". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  10. ^ a b Davies, Stephen (22 October 2009). "Proof on the balance of probabilities: what this means in practice". Practical Law. Thomson Reuters.
  11. ^ Mitchell, Tony (23 July 2014). "Australia: Does a waiver wave away all rights to make a claim for restitution?". Mondaq. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  12. ^ Speiser, Stuart M.; Malawer, Stuart S. (1976). "American Tragedy: Damages for Mental Anguish of Bereaved Relatives in Wrongful Death". Tulane Law Review. 51 (1). Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  13. ^ See, e.g., "Motley v. Colley, 769 S.W.2d 477 (Mo.App. 1989)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  14. ^ King, E.M.; Smith, J.P. (1988). "Computing economic loss in cases of wrongful death". Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi. Journal of the Physiological Society of Japan. 52 (12): 385–392. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  15. ^ Tate v. Canonica, 180 Cal. App. 2d 898, 909, 5 Cal. Rptr. 28, 36 (1960).
  16. ^ State ex rel. Richardson v. Edgeworth, 214 So.2d 579 (Miss. 1968).
  17. ^ Mayer v. Town of Hampton, 127 N.H. 81, 497 A.2d 1206 (1985).
  18. ^ R.D. v. W.H., 875 P.2d 26 (Wyo. 1994).
  19. ^ Nolan, Donal (2012). "The Fatal Accidents Act 1846". In Arvind, T.T.; Steele, Jenny (eds.). Tort law and the legislature : common law, statute and the dynamics of legal change. Oxford: Hart Publishing. pp. 131–157. ISBN 9781782250548.
  20. ^ "Fatal Accidents Act 1976". Legislation. National Archives. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
  NODES
eth 2
see 5