User:JWSchmidt/Blog/25 February 2007
This page is part of JWSchmidt's Wikiversity blog Feel free to add comments. |
16 August 2015 - Wiki Studies |
16 April 2011 - Openness |
29 January 2011 - Drama Queens |
13 June 2010 - Bull |
5 April 2010 - Breaches |
22 September - Experts |
27 January - Your Banned |
14 January 2009 - Wikiversity Bans |
14 November - Custodianship |
19 October - Review Part II |
10 October - My vacation |
16 September - Moulton |
15 September - Forking |
7 September - Distorting |
27 August - Wikipedia studies |
1 March 2008 - The real world |
12 January - Fair Use and the GFDL |
2 January 2008 - Wiki Council |
---- start 2008 ---- |
31 December - Participatory Learning |
19 December - Foundation Changes |
1 December - Changing the GFDL? |
13 November - What is Wikiversity? |
10 November - Expert editors (part II) |
14 October 2007 - Vandal Wiki |
20 September - Collaborative video interface |
4 September - Open Source Crusade |
31 August - CheckUser |
4 August - Collaborative videos |
20 July - Options for video-in-wiki |
1 July - Networking Web 2.0 Websites |
7 June 2007 - GFDL violations |
27 May - Wikiversity namespace |
22 May 2007 - Wikiversity tagline |
20 May - The newbie game |
16 May - Tangled Hierarchies |
12 May - Navigation boxes |
11 May 2007 - Forced editing |
9 May - Wikipedia Learning |
6 May - Music collaborations |
25 Mar - Reliable Sources |
17 Mar - Version flagging |
11 Mar - Research policy discussion |
10 Mar 2007 - Credentials |
3 Mar - Free media files |
28 Feb - Delete or develop? |
27 Feb 2007 - Main Page |
25 Feb - Science and Protoscience |
23 Feb - Complementing Wikipedia |
21 Feb - Copyleft media files |
19 Feb - Gratis versus Libre |
18 Feb 2007 - Referees |
16 Feb - MediaWiki interface |
15 Feb - Content development projects |
14 Feb - Scope of Research |
13 Feb 2007 - Review Board |
12 Feb - Rounded corners |
11 Feb - Open vs free content |
10 Feb - Research guidelines |
9 Feb - Learning resource diversity |
8 February - Wikiversity referees. |
7 February 2007 - Wikio. |
5 February - Research policy. |
2 February - Portal cleanup done. |
31 January - Reliable sources. |
29 January - Learning projects and materials. |
27 January - Recording voice chat. |
25 January - Animated GIF files with GIMP. |
23 January - User page cleanup. |
21 January 2007 - List of portals. |
20 January - 2 more portals. "Courses" |
19 Jan, - Portals and templates. |
18 January site statistics - 20,000 pages. |
18 January - Creating and organizing portals. |
17 January - Categories of Wikiversity schools. |
16 Jan. - Featured content development projects. |
15 January - Wikiversity status at 5 months. |
14 January - The "Topic:" namespace |
13 January - Featured content |
13 January - Wikiversity Bugs |
12 January 2007 - Start of the blog |
---- start 2007 ---- |
24 October, 2006 - Wikiversity history |
26 April, 2005 - Wiki reality games |
17 March, 2004 - Semantic prosthetic |
edit this list |
Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience
Continuing activity at Science and the nonphysical finally prompted my to get around to making Pseudoscience and Protoscience to complement What is science?. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like Topic:Intelligent Design as a content development project within School:Doing science. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of Topic:Exobiology that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop UFO research.
Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of Mind-Body Intervention. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within School:Medicine. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Their main mind-body page lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikiversity learning project.
I noticed today that the article "A community experiment with fully open and published peer review" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."