Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ṓms
Proto-Indo-European
editAlternative reconstructions
edit- *h₁om(e)so-, *h₄om(e)so-,[1] *h₁ōm(e)so-, *h₄ōm(e)so-[2]
- *h₂óm-s-s ~ *h₂m-és-m̥ ~ *h₂m̥-s-ós[3]
- *h₃emeso-[4]
- *h₃ém-ōs ~ *h₃m̥-s-ós[5]
- *h₃ems-o-[6][7]
Noun
edit*h₂ṓms m
Inflection
editThe varied stems in the descendants have been believed to be thematic derivatives of an underlying base s-stem noun. The inflection of this base s-stem noun is disputed.
According to Martirosyan:
Athematic, proterokinetic | |||
---|---|---|---|
singular | |||
nominative | *h₂ṓms | ||
genitive | *h₂mésos | ||
singular | dual | plural | |
nominative | *h₂ṓms | *h₂ómsh₁(e) | *h₂ómses |
vocative | *h₂óms | *h₂ómsh₁(e) | *h₂ómses |
accusative | *h₂ómsm̥ | *h₂ómsh₁(e) | *h₂ómsm̥s |
genitive | *h₂mésos | *? | *h₂mésoHom |
ablative | *h₂mésos | *? | *h₂mésmos, *h₂mésbʰos |
dative | *h₂mésey | *? | *h₂mésmos, *h₂mésbʰos |
locative | *h₂més, *h₂mési | *? | *h₂mésu |
instrumental | *h₂mésh₁ | *? | *h₂mésmis, *h₂mésbʰis |
According to Kroonen:
Athematic, amphikinetic | |||
---|---|---|---|
singular | |||
nominative | *h₃émōs | ||
genitive | *h₃m̥sés | ||
singular | dual | plural | |
nominative | *h₃émōs | *h₃émosh₁(e) | *h₃émoses |
vocative | *h₃émos | *h₃émosh₁(e) | *h₃émoses |
accusative | *h₃émosm̥ | *h₃émosh₁(e) | *h₃émosm̥s |
genitive | *h₃m̥sés | *? | *h₃m̥sóHom |
ablative | *h₃m̥sés | *? | *h₃m̥smós, *h₃m̥sbʰós |
dative | *h₃m̥séy | *? | *h₃m̥smós, *h₃m̥sbʰós |
locative | *h₃m̥és, *h₃m̥ési | *? | *h₃m̥sú |
instrumental | *h₃m̥séh₁ | *? | *h₃m̥smís, *h₃m̥sbʰís |
Derived terms
editDescendants
editReferences
edit- ^ Mallory, J. P. with Adams, D. Q. (2006) The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (Oxford Linguistics), New York: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 179
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Adams, Douglas Q. (2013) “āntse”, in A Dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and Greatly Enlarged (Leiden Studies in Indo-European; 10), Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, →ISBN, page 46
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Martirosyan, Hrach (2010) Etymological Dictionary of the Armenian Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 8), Leiden and Boston: Brill, page 643
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Sihler, Andrew L. (1995) New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 43
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Guus Kroonen (2013) Alexander Lubotsky, editor, Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 11)[1], Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN
- ^ Beekes, Robert S. P. (2010) “ὦμος”, in Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 10), with the assistance of Lucien van Beek, Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, pages 1679-1680
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Lubotsky, Alexander (2011) “áṃsa-”, in The Indo-Aryan Inherited Lexicon (in progress) (Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Project), Leiden University
- ^ Schrijver, Peter C. H. (1991) The reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals in Latin (Leiden studies in Indo-European; 2), Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, →ISBN
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 De Vaan, Michiel (2008) “umerus”, in Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 7), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 640
- ^ Pokorny, Julius (1959) “om(e)so-s”, in Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [Indo-European Etymological Dictionary] (in German), volume 3, Bern, München: Francke Verlag, page 778
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Vladimir Orel (2003) “*amsaz”, in A Handbook of Germanic Etymology[2], Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 17