Reconstruction:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/g/s-ni-s
Proto-Sino-Tibetan
editEtymology
edit- Proto-Sino-Tibetan: ?
- Proto-Tibeto-Burman: *g/s-ni-s (Matisoff, STEDT); *g-nis (Benedict, 1972; Chou, 1972; LaPolla, 1987); *g-ni-s (Weidert, 1987)
Alongside the root for "three" (*g-sum), this root for "two" is one of the most lexemically and phonologically stable numerals in Sino-Tibetan languages, and lexical replacement of this etymon is excessively rare: e.g. Jingpho /ləkhôŋ/ which has not been successfully connected to anything else. The Jingpho word for "one" has a similar shape, /ləŋâi/, and is also etymologically unclear.
This root appears unmistakably cognate with *s-ni-s (“seven”). See there for more.
The Burmese form seems to suggest a proto-language velar final variant: *-ik.
Numeral
edit*s-ni-s
Proto-Sino-Tibetan numerals | |
---|---|
ONE | *ʔit *kat *tjak ~ g-t(j)ik |
TWO | *g/s-ni-s |
THREE | *g-sum |
FOUR | *b-ləj |
FIVE | *l/b-ŋa |
SIX | *d-k-ruk |
SEVEN | *s-ni-s |
EIGHT | *b-r-gjat ~ b-g-rjat |
NINE | *d/s-kəw |
TEN | *gip *ts(j)i(j) ~ tsjaj |
TWENTY | *m-kul |
HUNDRED | *b-r-gja |
THOUSAND | *s-tawŋ |
Descendants
edit- Old Chinese: 二 (*njis)
- Middle Chinese: 二 (ȵiɪH)
- The template Template:Sinoxenic does not use the parameter(s):
5=i
Please see Module:checkparams for help with this warning.**:
- The template Template:Sinoxenic does not use the parameter(s):
- Middle Chinese: 二 (ȵiɪH)
- Old Chinese: 次 (*sn̥ʰis, “second; next; the following”)
- Himalayish
- Tangut-Qiang
- Sal
- Lolo-Burmese-Naxi
- Proto-Karen: *k-hnejᴬ (Luangthongkum, 2013)
- S'gaw Karen: ခံ (khee)
- Kho-Bwa:
- Proto-Western Kho-Bwa: *nʲis (see there for further descendants)