Talk:blue moon

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Arlo Barnes in topic senses

senses

edit

Why is the correct definition of "blue moon" marked "obsolete", and the discredited mistake given as the official definition?

It really should be the other way around.

Besides being wrong, the given definition is ambiguous, allowing under the right circumstances a moon to be blue in Los Angeles, while in New York it's the next moon that will be considered blue. — special:contribs/99.236.29.120 09:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be fixed. — Arlo Barnes (talk) 01:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
see 1