Content deleted Content added
Duuuude!: request
Duuuude!: request fulfilled, removing request
Line 68:
You need to lighten up. If I am mistaken, explain it calmly. Also listen, because there might be nuggets of wisdom in my criticisms. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 15:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
*You're a nice guy and I'm sure you mean well, but declaring how oversighters should do their jobs and calling anyone who doesn't do it your way "clueless" and unfit for the task is totally inappropriate, especially from someone who has offered to take a supervisory and disciplinary role over those very people. [[User talk:Thatcher|Thatcher]] 15:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
**Everyone means well, even our worst POV warriors. Maybe I didn't express my point well, because; I wasn't looking to start a war. The simple idea is that there should be minimal sanity checking before a request is performed. Such as type the disputed phrase into the wiki search box (or Google) and see what pops up. This will identify any cultural references. As I said to Risker, if I say to you "Thanks, Abe Lincoln" after you say something particularly honest, we don't want that to be Oversighted by a steward from Bangladesh who's never heard of [[Abraham Lincoln]].
**A better audit report would have said "Sorry, we acted like the [[Keystone Kops]]. This was a comedy of errors, and we'll be smarter next time; however, there was no bad faith or malicious intent by any involved party." [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 15:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 
I struck parts of my remark. Would you please remove your aspersion on my character? I suffered more than enough of those lately. Thank you. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
  NODES
Idea 1
idea 1
USERS 2