Content deleted Content added
→Section break: re |
|||
Line 291:
*Regardless of what she is best known for or whatever, it's pretty clear that she did not "first [come] to public prominence for her starring role in the 1995 film Clueless." As Dream Focus mentioned above, she had at least somewhat notable roles before this that caught the public eye. As it stands now, the sentence is not correct or acceptable, nor is it actually backed up by the sources that are there.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 00:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
*:Agree. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 04:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
*:Agree as well. Verification of those sources failed to show that. I think it is very risky to state that some "came first to prominence" or "is best best known". Those things are hardly every objective facts. I suggest we take a couple of sources, see what they state (believe that's done before) and then make a less definite statement in the lead. E.g.: she is known (not best known, or perhaps best known) for xxx, xxx and xxx picking the 2-4 films from various sources. Would that be a good starting point? [[User:L.tak|L.tak]] ([[User talk:L.tak|talk]]) 05:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
| |||