Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Bridesmill (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 297:
::I agree [[User:Bridesmill|Bridesmill]], see I don’t have any problems with the book being in the article, but there should be something about the book in the article of Bibi Fatima (AS). Just putting the book’s link in the article doesn’t make nay sense because there is no information about the book in the whole article .Si I suggest that the book should be listed in See Also. Thank You--[[User:Salman01|Salman]] 15:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:::Asked the question at the book's article as to how rest of Islam sees this book; then I noticed Striver did most of the work - hopefully he'll answer here {{smiley|1}}. That will allow reasonbable decision on if it belongs in Works or in Shi'a section or just in See also (but given significanceI think it deserves more than 2 words)[[User:Bridesmill|Bridesmill]] 15:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
| |||