Revision as of 17:37, 2 December 2006 edit DJRafe (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 7,681 edits late reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:48, 16 December 2006 edit undo Roger Arguile (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,930 edits →late reply Next edit →
Line 155: Grover C: Thanks for your note a while back about references. Apologies that this reply is very belated; I'm still kind of figuring out the system here. I'll see how well I can keep up with updating classical music entries. Thanks again, DJRafe == St. Paul== I have reverted your edits because I think, in the first case, you mistake the nature of the assertion which is simply about the number of words which can be counted in the pages of the NT. The second issue relates to the meaning of the word arguably. It is such a well-recognised point that I can think no scholars who disagree. Even if Acts was written in 64 this is ten years of more after St. Paul is held to have written his letters. Please tell me who your scholars are who disagree. [[User:Roger Arguile\|Roger Arguile]] 11:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Grover cleveland