Content deleted Content added
Zen-master (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 95:
What do people think? [[User:Zen-master|zen master ]] [[User talk:Zen-master| T ]] 07:52, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
::Your second word, 'radiation' is off the mark in this context, I think, unfortunately. It is 'radiation-induced nuclear fision' or 'accelerated nuclear decay' that is the unnatuaral aspect of nuclear power generation. Trouble is that those phrases, while more accurate, are less accessible and less likely to be understood by the average reader of this article. It's hard to shorten them as both 'fision' and 'decay' describe a "natural" nuclear process (i.e. it's always gone on, without the help of man). I'll keep thinking. Can anyone else help here? [[User:Nigelj|Nigelj]] 17:34, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
| |||