Content deleted Content added
Paul Siebert (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 102:
:::::Anyway, if you have some additional information about questionable behaviour of that user, you may post it here. I'll take a look.--[[User:Paul Siebert|Paul Siebert]] ([[User talk:Paul Siebert#top|talk]]) 21:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
::::::For example, I find this behavior really unfair: the user tries to convince (with success) an administrator that a user who was backing him in the discussion was not a sockpuppet[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ymblanter#FYI] (actually it was legitimate to have high suspicions), and at the same time intervenes to ban another user accused sockpuppetry[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Apollo_The_Logician&diff=1006812245&oldid=1006792811] who was opposing him in the discussion. The other day it turns out that the user he was defending was really a vandalizer\sockpuppet.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Beanom#The_quality_of_mercy] Could it all be a coincidence? To me it all seems part of a plan to carry on their own personal POV-pushing battle on Wikipedia. If this is his way of acting and planning, I dare not imagine what kind of actions he has done on the whole encyclopedia. I have neither the knowledge nor the time to carry out an investigation of this type. I don't mean to have certainties, but strong doubts are legitimate at this point. <small>(Could you please ping me when you answer me?)</small>--[[User:Mhorg|Mhorg]] ([[User talk:Mhorg|talk]]) 08:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
| |||