Content deleted Content added
→Your reversion of my latest edit on Isotoxal figure: Thanked, & asked 1 more question. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 396:
:--[[User:JavBol|JavBol]] ([[User talk:JavBol|talk]]) 23:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
:::No. It is not allowed. It is not recommended. It is a bad idea. How many times do I have to tell you not to mix these two incompatible types of formatting. If you really need to not italicize <math>\mathrm{AB}=\sqrt3</math>, use <nowiki><math>\mathrm{AB}=\sqrt3</math></nowiki>, but note that they are still going to be a different font than the article text. (Also, that formatting is for two separate variables <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>; the formatting for a multi-letter symbol like <math>\sin</math> in a math formula is different.) Why would you not want to italicize them? —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 00:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
::::Thank you for your latest answers. OK, I don't personally want to not italicize lengths; a few years ago (I don't remember when), an experienced user (I don't remember who) removed my LaTeX-formatting from several not-inline math formulas in a Wikipedia article (I don't remember which one), and I assumed that they did so in order to disitalicize the lengths in these formulas.
::::Well then, how should I format the length of the segment between a point A and a point B, please?
::::[[User:JavBol|JavBol]] ([[User talk:JavBol|talk]]) 00:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
|