Revision as of 03:08, 28 August 2007 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,738 edits m Automatically signing comment made by Sposer ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:29, 28 August 2007 edit undo Sposer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,684 edits →Recent Jonkozer edits Next edit →
Line 994: Meanwhile, you have reverted my edits three times. That is in violation of wiki rules. I can have you blocked. In an attempt to be civil, I will not. But I strongly suggest you stop edit warring, and stop putting your own analysis on this. I really do not understand why you insist on, in an encyclopedic article, using Dr. Pruden's nickname. Even on traders.com, it says Henry "Hank" Pruden. A proper name is correct here. As for Phil Roth, I will double check with him on his idea of sentiment tomorrow and let you know, ~~but~~whether he ~~not~~considers non-price/volume/o.i. ~~information~~sentiment issurveys ~~certainly~~as ~~a valid thing to look at~~TA, ~~and~~or ~~worth~~something ~~looking at correlations~~adjunct to TA, ~~but~~and ~~that~~likely ~~does~~valuable ~~not~~in ~~make~~forecasting itthe TAmarkets.. Pretty much anything that is not sourced is original research. I can see where you are coming up with assumptions about what Murphy and Roth are saying, and will check with them and let you know, whether they agree with me or not. If they agree with you, I will leave it be. If they do not, I will edit the changes.[[User:Sposer\|Sposer]] 03:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC) I assume you don't know all the rules here, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt. However, original research is not allowed. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sposer\|Sposer]] ([[User talk:Sposer\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sposer\|contribs]]) 03:06, August 28, 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Talk:Technical analysis: Difference between revisions