Content deleted Content added
Cheesy mike (talk | contribs) |
→Order of Infoboxes: my two cents worth |
||
Line 83:
World h site first, the same reason as on the [[Maritime Greenwich]] Article. [[User:Kentem|Blackwave......]] ([[User talk:Kentem|talk]]) 11:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
:The reason quoted in the Greenwich article is that the infobox is boring and doesn't have an image. If that is your only reason then it is very easy to put an image into the UK place infobox - I have done this. My opinion is that Bath is a living, working city first and a world heritage tourist site second. For that reason I believe the UK place infobox takes precedence. --[[User:Cheesy mike|Cheesy Mike]] ([[User talk:Cheesy mike|talk]]) 13:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
:Given that the purpose of the infobox is to give a standardised summary of the main points about its subject, the question becomes which of the two infoboxes best summarises the article. There's no doubt that's the UK place infobox, and that therefore it should come first. I'd also say that having the two infoboxes immediately following one another looks a bit naff as well. The Greenwich article at least has some separation between them, even though they are in the wrong order. --[[User:Malleus Fatuarum|Malleus Fatuorum]] ([[User talk:Malleus Fatuarum|talk]]) 15:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
| |||