Content deleted Content added
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →Arabian Penninsula: Discussion elsewhere |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21:
:::Who cares what Jabotinsky "admitted" or not. There is a certain common definition for the Arabian Peninsula which *all* sources support: [http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761556449/arabian_peninsula.html Encarta], [http://www.metmuseum.org/TOAH/hd/m_wap/hd_m_wap.htm Metropolitan Museum], Britannica and also Merriam-Webster's Geographical Dictionary (accept that they also explain historical terms). The fact that at some point in time a term that had the root "arab" in it referred to other places is completely not to the point. Your attempt to make the Arabian Peninsula include all the area of the levant is pure vandalism and should stop! Also watch your language! [[User:Mashkin|Mashkin]] ([[User talk:Mashkin#top|talk]]) 15:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
::::This issue has also been discussed at [[User talk:EdJohnston]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 17:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
== Bernard Madoff ==
RE: copyright a book. trademark a product. please reinsert in abridged form. Ruth's frame of mind and the influence she gave to or gleaned from her husband is why the new york times wrote the article. Her perceptions of power and success should be stated or inferred. It is the evolution of her goals for fame, recognition (and notoriety!)
thanx 4 your assistence. some facts that you deleted, however are relevant.
RE: Hadassah. This is merely the first one which has come forward which will be compelled to return money from non-profit organizations. We will add more as they are disclosed. If you delete this, it will be difficult to locate it again. The link is a JTA article from New York Jewish Week [http://www.thejewishweek.com/viewArticle/c36_a14606/News/New_York.html]
The facts were taken from the article, not the blog attached. Please reinsert. It can be deleted later, but it is already difficult to locate on the jta website.
thanx. [[User:Furtive admirer|Furtive admirer]] ([[User talk:Furtive admirer|talk]]) 17:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
== Jonathan Pollard ==
Grammar and Syntax corrections made
Commutation Precedence: There is always a basis to justify motives by a president, even if it's monetary.
It's a president's final legacy, and if his aides had found a precedence to justify Pollard's clemency, they would have presented it to him; but they didn't bother to research it. There was absolutely no historical gain for Bush to aid Pollard, without a presidence.
Peres is current: Bush phoned him and he spoke about Hitler, but remained silent on Pollard, just like the world remained silent on the Jews of Europe in 1933. It was an irony and a juxtaposition that should be re-inserted from the horse's mouth.[[http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/World/Story/A1Story20090120-115843.html]] "The only world leader to comment on Mr Bush's outreach, Mr Peres, praised Mr Bush's support for Israel and the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, saying: 'Had the world acted against Hitler the way you did against Saddam Hussein, the lives of millions would have been spared.' " He should have said "ditto for Pollard..."
thanx. [[User:Furtive admirer|Furtive admirer]] ([[User talk:Furtive admirer|talk]]) 17:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||