Wikipedia talk:Incivility blocks: Difference between revisions

:::::::Well, I honestly believe that administrators never should use the words you mentioned, and besides, if a user is using the words like those rather sooner than later, he will use them to call the names as in your example. IMO your first examples using words only is incivility, your second example is incivility + personal attack. Down with such administrators. They do much more harm than they do good. --[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1|talk]]) 23:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

:::::::: On one hand, the words Ludwigs2 listed have their place, & I will use them when I think the occasion calls for their use. However, I am also aware that overuse not only weakens their impact but distracts the reader from the message -- so I will use them as sparingly as one uses a pungent spice in cooking. On the other hand, habitual use of these words would lead to someone asking the user to "clean up your language", & if several people have done this without the user cleaning up her/his act that person will get banned for disruption. In short, let's not belabor the point; pottymouths will be shown the door regardless what the rules are. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 00:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

 

==Comment by WFCforLife==