Revision as of 17:40, 17 July 2014 edit Bali88 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,595 edits →Emphasis ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:33, 27 August 2014 edit undo Bali88 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 6,595 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 404: :::I agree with this. Personally, I find the historical focus of the organization to be far more interesting and useful than their nicknames. I see this conversation was started four years ago. Is there any reason it didn't go that way? [[User:Bali88\|Bali88]] ([[User talk:Bali88\|talk]]) 17:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC) ==Are the nicknames really useful?== I'm wondering what everyone's thoughts are on replacing the "nickname" category with the year they were created. To me, the nickname of an organization just isn't an interesting fact, not to mention most of them are likely either unsourced and/or unsourceable. I would find other facts about the organizations more interesting on a list like this. [[User:Bali88\|Bali88]] ([[User talk:Bali88\|talk]]) 22:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk:List of social fraternities: Difference between revisions