Content deleted Content added
Line 412:
I'm removing double listings. There aren't a ton of them, but as long as the article is, I don't think it's necessary. I think the best solution is to add them to the group that is shortest. For instance, Alpha Phi Alpha has dual membership with NAIC and NPHC. NAIC is a huge list, NPHC is short, so therefore, it should go in the NPHC section with a note that it also belongs to NAIC. That should improve readability, I think. [[User:Bali88|Bali88]] ([[User talk:Bali88|talk]]) 21:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
:I completely disagree. To do so is to indicate that its NPHC membership is somehow more valid than its NIC (never NAIC) membership. And I'm curious as to any other doubles that you have, the 4 NPHC Fraternities are the only ones that I know.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 23:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
::There were multiple doubles. If you look at the other tables of APIA and Latino organizations, there are multiple organizations with dual membership and then there were a few with dual memberships that weren't listed. I don't think it's implies anything about the worth of the memberships and the dual memberships are noted. But if we have consensus, I'll put them back. [[User:Bali88|Bali88]] ([[User talk:Bali88|talk]]) 03:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
==Alpha Iota Omicron==
| |||