Content deleted Content added
Line 62:
:: Hi {ping|Sphilbrick}, what I great idea, I will see what I can do - <tt>[[User:Rich_Smith|<span style="color:Red;">Rich</span>]]</tt><sup>[[User talk:Rich_Smith|T]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Rich_Smith|C]]&#124;[[Special:EmailUser/Rich_Smith|E-Mail]]</sup> 21:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
:::That was quick! FYI - I will have limited access to internet until tomorrow morning at the airport - maybe.--[[User:Sphilbrick|<span style="color:#000E2F;padding:0 4px;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">S Philbrick</span>]][[User talk:Sphilbrick|<span style=";padding:0 4px;color:# 000;font-family: Copperplate Gothic Light">(Talk)</span>]] 21:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
{{undent}}The edits are undone rather than removed, though. And other than the edit summary, the rest of the warning are templates on-wiki that can be edited. See these:
{{Special:Prefixindex/User:ClueBot NG/Warnings/}}
I certainly do not object to rewording the edit summary, but be advised that the edit summary is limited in the size and in many cases we are already bumping up against that. Perhaps a better wording would be one of these:
* "Reverting edit by <user> to version by <user>. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)"
* "Reverting possibly non-compliant edit by <user> to version by <user>. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)"
* "Reverting contentious edit by <user> to version by <user>. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)"
* "Reverting dubious edit by <user> to version by <user>. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)"
* "Reverting possibly non-constructive edit by <user> to version by <user>. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)"
* "[[WP:BRD|Undoing]] edit by <user> to version by <user>. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)"
But "Edit by <user> has been removed by Bot due to possible noncompliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (<rev id>) (Bot)" is long and loses the obvious fact that the edit was a revert, and is longer than any of the other ones, doesn't mention the user of the version that was reverted to, and is misleading in that the edit was not removed, just reverted. -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]<sup>([[User talk:Cobi|t]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]&#124;[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]])</sup> 22:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  NODES
admin 1
Idea 1
idea 1
INTERN 1
USERS 1