Content deleted Content added
→Antiprism article infobox: Lost reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 723:
:[[User:RavBol|RavBol]] ([[User talk:RavBol|talk]]) 22:08, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
The infobox is only valid for uniform antiprisms. Much of the information it contains is wrong or inapplicable in the more general case. And the title of the infobox has the word "uniform" in it, clarifying that it is only intended to be valid for uniform antiprisms. Uniform antiprisms are always convex. Star antiprisms are a different case, not part of the uniform case. Trying to make the infobox handle more general cases is hopeless, so better not to even try. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein#top|talk]]) 22:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
:I trust you, & i will adapt this infobox... but i'm a bit lost:
:i don't understand why the star antiprisms that are vertex-transitive & that have regular polygon faces are not uniform;
:is it just by definition, please?
:(Some other polyhedra are non-convex but are uniform, & some of them are even regular.)
:[[User:RavBol|RavBol]] ([[User talk:RavBol|talk]]) 00:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
| |||