Expatkiwi

cleared 4 January 2007

I do not wish to have any of the comments on my use page archived. That's it, goodbye, end of story.

Unspecified source for Image:Island.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Island.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kaldari 22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Bloodorder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodorder.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Lynch1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lynch1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nzc-2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nzc-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Jealous of the Greeks aren't we

I read you post in ATCA and I think you are a despicable jealous person. Saying that "This Greek feeling of superiority and their view that ends always justify the means, no matter how many other non-Greeks suffer will be their downfall. They honestly expect the world to think that they are owed something, just because of their ancient history. Hellenic pride has caused a lot of suffering and killing" is not only a misleading statement but a travesty which shows how much of a low person you are. If you hate Western civilization then get out of the USA, which was founded on the basis of the Romans and the Greeks. By the way, yes we are proud of proud of our history and as a Greek I have the right to. You are a poor soul. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.5.94.15 (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

You do have blood on your hands, by extension to your forefathers who killed some Maori and confiscated tribal lands.

Your dislikes

I have reverted your re-addition of your dislikes of other countries to your userpage per WP:USER and WP:NOT. If you persists in the addition of the inflamatroy content your userpage will be protected or you will be blocked. For further discussion of this matter please see this. Viridae^Talk 09:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

UN Buffer Zone in Cyprus

Your questions have been answered in Talk:UN Buffer Zone in Cyprus. I do not have anything more to add, apart from this: if u think that u can present Isaak and Solomou as people who "committed suicide", u are wrong. Your point was not to show balance, but to legitimize two murders [1]. Copy violation is clear; bolding specific quotes is also POV-pushing; presentation of the "counter arguments" for 2 murders of civilians 3 times longer than the events, also shows bias. In addition, the source u quote is published by the British Northern Cyprus Parliamentary Group? who recognizes this group and by whom is it considered valid? U said: though I wonder if that point is made in Greek dictionaries: the truth is that the Greek sources are not different than the rest western sources and dictionaries... perhaps "other" dictionaries are by far less legitimate... As for the "revisionism" that u accused me of, I strongly believe that the revisionism comes from the other side; isn't that strange that immediately after Turkey protested against Cyprus, u appeared to alter the facts of 1996? Hectorian 23:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Cyprus

What do you mean a "deliberate risk"? Are you saying being murdered in that fashion was something one could reasonably expect? It may be in Turkey and its satellites, but in the civilized world it is not (not in 1996 at least). Thulium 18:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

PS you say "[a] puppet regime is one imposed on an occupied people". Where am I losing you? Do you think the people elected them or is it being enforced by the Turkish occupation force and given an aura of legitimacy (not recognized as such by outsiders) by the votes of the Turkish colonizers? Thulium 18:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The same "colonizers" who voted for reunification in 2004? --A.Garnet 23:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

On whose behest one may wonder, I hear the Turkish government supported the scheme. Thulium 00:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, just like the UN, EU, Turkish Cypriots (60,000 protestors to vote yes) and just about anyone else you can think of. Oh except 75% of GC's. --A.Garnet 00:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Of course, they didn't. They haven't got the money for such luxuries, none of the people "supporting" it had lost their home and any reasonable prospect of getting it back. Do you blame them though? That proposal was one step short of establishing a Turkish Cypriot oligarchy over the island. Thulium 00:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

They havent got money for such luxuries? Please, TC's have been under an embargoe for over 30 years, dont tell me about luxuries. --A.Garnet 00:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

With Mother Turkey's breast over their heads? Cyprus is not Armenia (who is under embargo by Turkey, is landlocked and borders states with very serious problems of their own). TCs (or rather the Turkish government having regards to their treaty obligations to the EU) know what they have to do to end it. Thulium 00:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Anyway, the embargo against northern Cyprus is the reason why they accepted the Annan Plan. It would be lifted and unlike the Greek Cypriots, after reunification, they would not be left on the streets. Thulium 00:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

That's true, as they wouldn't be on the streets because they would all have been kicked off the island... Expatkiwi