Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BillFlis (talk | contribs) at 10:28, 26 March 2010 (XML). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 14 years ago by BillFlis in topic XML

New or Fix existing typos

I have come across a couple typos that are either not working or need to be added. Below are a few that I have found that either need to be added or don't seem to be working.

Workign -> Working

For some reason, AWB tried to replace "Workign" with "Wooking" here (I correct it manually), but it should be "Working". --bender235 (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

'yound' / 'young' and 'switchs' / 'switches'

I've noticed both while looking over today's recent changes. Are they sufficiently notable to include in the list?  Mephistophelian (talkcontributions) 22:37, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Distict

Looks like Distict is changed to Distinct. ("<Typo word="Distinct_" find="\b(D|d)is(?:ctinc|tic|inc|t[ai]n(?=ti))t(i(ve|on|vely)|ly)?\b" replace="$1istinct$2" /> ") But it might as well be a typo for District. (Especially if capitalized).--ospalh (talk) 09:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it can be. I haven't found any good ways to differentiate between the two. Rjwilmsi 10:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Exception for "antarctica" rule

Could someone please add an exception for Sinfonia antartica to that "Antarctica" rule, because I falsely "fixed" that on Vernon Handley [1], and I don't think many people know that it in fact isn't a typo. --bender235 (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Done updated rules. Rjwilmsi 08:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Occasionally

Why is "occasionanlly" corrected to "occasionnally", from an incorrect spelling to another incorrect spelling? I know that there is a rule for -anlly -> -nally, but it shouldn't apply to that case. PleaseStand (talk) 02:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Done Rule updated to avoid that one. Rjwilmsi 08:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

XML

I would like to suggest we put this in a <source lang="xml">, add an <?xml> note, create a simple inline DTD, and encase the typos in a <typos> tag. This would allow easier use by common XML parsers like expat and DOM.--Ipatrol (talk) 03:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Each section is already so encased; it doesn't show up on the page, you have to edit it to see it. What are the advantages of doing what you're suggesting? Why, for example, would anyone ever want to use an XML parser (whatever that is!)?--BillFlis (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
HOME 2
languages 2
Note 1
os 11