Epicurus78

Joined 8 January 2014

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Epicurus78 (talk | contribs) at 19:03, 21 June 2017 (Redirecting your article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 7 years ago by Winged Blades of Godric in topic Redirecting your article

Welcome!

Hello, Epicurus78! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Allecher (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emery Emery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Emery Emery

You recently attempted to nominate an article for DYK with this template Template:Did you know nominations/Emery Emery. The template was not properly completed and is thus not displaying well. It is not clear what article is being nominated nor who created the article. I was attempting a fix but couldn't determine how to proceed. Please address the template immediately. If you created the nomination in error then feel free to delete it or I would be happy to delete it for you. EagerToddler39 (talk) 05:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

 
Hello, Epicurus78. You have new messages at EagerToddler39's talk page.
Message added 19:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

EagerToddler39 (talk) 19:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Emery Emery

Orlady (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Thomas Gilovich

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Redirecting your article

  • Ref-1 and 2--Same link.Sources to the book itself.Equivalent of no source!Barely proves that the book exists!
  • Ref 3, 5 and 8--The websitre is maintained by Center for Inquiry and apparently the author of the book is the CEO of the aforesaid organisation.Anything more to say?
  • Ref 6--Youtube is almost always unreliable.
  • Ref 7--See WP:BLOG.
Thus, I would sincerely hope that you choose to not revert my redirect lest .....Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 18:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the response. Here are my replies.

  • Ref 1 and 2- They are quotes from the book that illustrate its themes. I fail to see the problem. Plus, I linked to the ISBN number of the book, which is proof enough that the book is real.
  • Ref 3, 5 and 8- The website is the page for Free Inquiry on the Council for Secular Humanism, which is affiliated with the Center for Inquiry, correct, but it is not the same organization. Ronald A. Lindsay is no longer the CEO, and he didn't have primary editorial control of Free Inquiry when he was.
  • Ref 6- The guidelines say that we should take care when citing YouTube to check for reliability and possible copyright violations, not that "it's almost always unreliable." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Videos_as_references#YouTube_videos_as_references
  NODES
admin 1
COMMUNITY 2
Project 4