Talk:Dnipro
(Redirected from Talk:Dnipropetrovsk)
Latest comment: 9 days ago by Pachycephalosaurus Wyomingus in topic Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 November 2024
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
 |
This article links to one or more _target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Split proposed
editThe history section of this article is long enough to merit its own article. See also German-language article: History of Dnipro (city). Thoughts? -- M2545 (talk) 10:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- @M2545: I took out the political stuff (election results and famous politicians who were involved in national politics etc.) from the history section of this article the last days and placed this in Dnipro#Politics. I did this because looking at the Wikipedia articles History of London and History of Berlin this kind of information does not belong in the history section of a Wikipedia article about a city... Is in your opinion the history section of this article still long enough to merit its own article? I am afraid not, and is afraid that a History of Dnipro· will be nothing but only a slightly longer version then the history section of this article. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. unless there is to be substantial new material there is no cause for a separate history page.~~~ ManfredHugh (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
@M2545: & @ManfredHugh: I have expanded the history section in the weeks since last 30 August.... So it is longer now... I still think that it is not long enough for a separate article, but it is actually possible now to do it. And to be honest, I do not want to invest my time in a separate History of Dnipro English language Wikipedia article (because I will not learn any new things about one of my favourite cities while doing it). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose while the article is on the longer side (a little over 10000 words of readable prose), its not enough to justify an article split. Probs best to just do some condensing and cleanup and the article will be fine. Cheers, Dan the Animator 05:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 November 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the Medium Range Ballistic Missile with a non nuclear MIRV payload strike on dnipro to the russia-ukraine war section.188.155.107.191 (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have a reliable source we can cite for this addition? - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Russia launches new IRBM at Ukraine, Zelenskyy says Putin is 'terrified' - ABC News
- Video appears to show Russian missile strike on Ukraine | CNN
- yes i do! Pachycephalosaurus Wyomingus (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 11:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- i gave the source cnn. is that not reliable. and if so, why? thekingpachy (talk) 11:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)