Talk:Sun Records

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Sundayclose in topic Not Sun Records, but Sun Record Company

recording Black artists - capital B?

edit

The introduction says: recording Black artists, and to get Black music .
I'd suggest: write "recording black artists", and "to get black music" (even better: let's describe 'black music', instead of using a label). Or is there a new political-correctness, capitalising Black? -DePiep 14:06, 13 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Baby, Let's Play House

edit

The Cy Coben authorship has been noted elsewhere, as at this site. [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Steve Pastor (talkcontribs) 15:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Other companies known as Sun Records

edit

The information on other companies that have nothing to do with this one should be removed from the article. Propaniac (talk) 20:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The subject of the article is "Sun Records". However I have split off an article for Sun Records not run by Sam Phillips as Sun Records (other companies). Further improvements welcome. -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not Sun Records, but Sun Record Company

edit

The official (so solely right) names of this record company from 1952 to 1969 are Sun Record Company and Sun Record Co., Inc.. Its registered label is Sun, bought in 1969 by Sun International Corporation, renamed in 1987 to Sun Entertainment Corporation.

So, this article alleges the unofficial alias of the company. Is it a function of Wikipedia?

RocknRollArchivist (talk) 10:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Let's not be so legalistic. It is quite common on Wikipedia to use the commonly used name, which is simply "Sun Records". I think it's safe to assume that the vast majority of people familiar with the label, including many of the artists, knew it as "Sun" or "Sun Records". Sundayclose (talk) 15:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
INTERN 1
Note 2
Project 19