User talk:No Swan So Fine/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:No Swan So Fine. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
.gif){kind=link}
The Signpost: 30 September 2019
- From the editors: Where do we go from here?
- Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup
- Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads
- News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green
- Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
"THe Magic of Christmas (Nat King Cole album)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect THe Magic of Christmas (Nat King Cole album). Since you had some involvement with the THe Magic of Christmas (Nat King Cole album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 09:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Russians Are Coming Soundtrack.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in The Russians Are Coming, the Russians Are Coming#Musical score and soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Chiltern Tunnel
== Proposed deletion of Chiltern Tunnel ==
The article Chiltern Tunnel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No need for one line articles for every proposed tunnel, bridge, viaduct and other engineering structures along the length of HS2
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FDent (talk) 20:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Hot Jazz (Sarah Vaughan album - cover art).gif
.gif){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Hot Jazz (Sarah Vaughan album - cover art).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Nixon's visit to Lincoln Memorial
I am aware that you have created hundreds of articles, but am concerned that the extensive quoting from The Atlantic magazine tresspasses into copyright violation. I left a comment to that effect at the DYK nomination. David notMD (talk) 02:09, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Nixon's visit to the Lincoln Memorial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive Office Building (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Swan, hope you are keeping well. I've undone your removal of the Grade II* listing for the house. It is listed, as Historic England confirmed to me - details on the Talkpage. The listing, here, [1], appears under the title Sandringham House. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Just a bit more info. The issue of whether or not the house was listed had been kicked about on the Talkpage before I picked the article up. This was mixed up with the myth that Royal properties aren't listed, fueled by the delisting of Anmer Hall. So I thought I'd get it straight from the horse's mouth. You can see their email confirmation that the property is listed on the Talkpage. Hope all is well with you; I currently working on a rather interesting American Xanadu, for which I have high hopes. KJP1 (talk) 07:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'm not sure why it isn't individually listed as in other great houses within great landscapes, such as Dodington Park, Blenheim, even Buckingham Palace. I guess its just an aberration. My suspicions were fuelled by the lack of the red triangle, which even the lodges to Sandringham had. Great work though, and I'm looking forward to seeing your next FA. Best wishes No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2019
- In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit
- Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse
- Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars
- Community view: Observations from the mainland
- Arbitration report: October actions
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast
- Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello No Swan So Fine,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 811 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Category:St Mungo Prize recipients has been nominated for discussion
Category:St Mungo Prize recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi!
Hi! Thanks for noticing some of my stuff! --Doncram (talk) 11:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
DYK nomination of Richard Nixon's visit to the Lincoln Memorial
Hello! Your submission of Richard Nixon's visit to the Lincoln Memorial at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MX (✉ • ✎) 18:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1457 in art
A tag has been placed on Category:1457 in art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
Happy New Year!
 George Bellows, North River (1908), Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. |
Best wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2020. | |
| Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2019 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
Books & Bytes – Issue 37
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello No Swan So Fine,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Polar Bear (furniture)
On 20 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polar Bear (furniture), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kanye West sold his Maybach to buy a Polar Bear? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polar Bear (furniture). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Polar Bear (furniture)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
The article Jacob Juma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of in-depth coverage. WP:1EVENT type problem, also general fail at WP:NBIO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Songs with music by Bernie Hanighen
A tag has been placed on Category:Songs with music by Bernie Hanighen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Epidemics in Malta
Thanks for translating the article Epidemics in Malta! I have created three articles covering the most devastating plague epidemics: those of 1592–93, 1675–76 and 1813–14, and I intend to add some more details to your article.
As it stands, the article only covers plague outbreaks and epidemics. However, there were various notable epidemics of other diseases in Maltese history, such as the cholera epidemic of 1837. What is your opinion - should these be added to this article, or should it only cover plague outbreaks (it can then be renamed Plague epidemics in Malta)? Xwejnusgozo (talk) 15:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- The cholera outbreak really should be added to the article, great find. The French editor's work was astonishing - you can see from the edit history that I was struggling to covert the references! Wonderful work on the other articles, thank you. I think Malta is now the only country with a dedicated epidemics page! Do you know any good resources on Caffe Cordina? No Swan So Fine (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
Nugent Cachemaille-Day
Hi Swan - hope you’re well. I think you need to create a Category for Mr C-D before adding it? Take care. KJP1 (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Nomination of Rocks in My Bed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rocks in My Bed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocks in My Bed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Issue 38, January – April 2020
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
- New partnership
- Global roundup
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| for having the courage to create a minority article that others might not understand Whispyhistory (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC) |
- Such articles add greatly to the depth and richness of the encyclopedia. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Deletion discussion not finished
You don't need to add an infobox to "On a Little Street". The deletion discussion hasn't finished, and the lack of an infobox isn't one of the problems. The problems that do exist are stated in the discussion. You would be better served by reading my comments at the deletion discussion for "Confirmation" because there is some question about whether sources are being used correctly. That may be something you want to take a look at more carefully. Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 16:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Editors are encouraged to continue expanding articles during AFDs, including adding infoboxes. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Did No Swan So Fine retire or do you always answer for him?
Vmavanti (talk) 19:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)- Can you please not be so uncivil? I answered your queries on the "Confirmation" AFD page. The infobox is typical for such articles. No Swan So Fine (talk) 20:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- They seem to have forgotten a lot of the advice on their own user page. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Can you please not be so uncivil? I answered your queries on the "Confirmation" AFD page. The infobox is typical for such articles. No Swan So Fine (talk) 20:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Did No Swan So Fine retire or do you always answer for him?
William H. Powell
Thanks for the comments on William Henry Powell (soldier). Much of the information for Powell came from my research on the 2nd West Virginia Volunteer Cavalry Regiment. My guess is that he had a bushwhacker hanged that he probably should not have, and the trouble was "swept under the rug" with his resignation—only my guess. If not for that issue (or something we do not know about), I believe he would have become more well known in our history books. TwoScars (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Women Make Film
Hi! There are dozens of incorrect links on the Women Make Film that I'm trying to fix. Your assistance to check each link would be appreciated. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 01:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've almost completed going through them. What incredible films I've been distracted by along the way! No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Olivia Dahl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivia Dahl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Dahl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Idolwyld (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
DYK for Death of Olivia Dahl
On 9 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Death of Olivia Dahl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Roald Dahl became an advocate of vaccination after his eldest daughter died from measles, saying that it was "almost a crime to allow your child to go unimmunized"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Death of Olivia Dahl), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
- Library Card Platform
- New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello No Swan So Fine,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
Another person was found in the same situation as Fuller, [2]. Should the article be renamed to focus on both of them or just one? 1989 (talk) 14:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- @1989: Sorry for the delay in replying. Yes, we should mention them. The link has been drawn by an RS. What a terrible situation. No Swan So Fine (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
DYK nomination of Samuel Goldwyn Estate
Hiya I've reviewed the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Samuel Goldwyn Estate and have made some comments/suggestions. Mujinga (talk) 18:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hiya, just a question on the image now. Mujinga (talk) 21:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy McGovern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Chapman.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
hi No Swan So Fine, i have just created a wikiarticle on the above ozzie artist, i notice there is now a link to your User:No Swan So Fine/futureness, not sure if this is who you had in mind, thought i would let you know. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Restaurants established in 1692
A tag has been placed on Category:Restaurants established in 1692 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
DYK nomination of Church Row, Hampstead
Hello! Your submission of Church Row, Hampstead at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mike Peel (talk) 11:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Port of Beirut grain silo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Port of Beirut grain silo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port of Beirut grain silo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi No Swan So Fine/Archive 10,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
Church Row, Hampstead
Where I live in Wales, the sun sets a quarter of an hour later than in London. The "time difference" is 15 minutes. In your Church Row, Hampstead hook you added the word "local" before "time difference", but I think this is inappropriate, and after I had moved your hook to the DYK queue, I removed "local". I have since read your discussions on Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Church_Row,_Hampstead. Are you happy with this removal? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
I am! You’re a great editor, thank you so much. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The article When Lights Are Low (Claire Martin and Richard Rodney Bennett album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NALBUM.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Hi i m facing problem regarding some of my articles which donot appear on google search.
They are not in mainpace of wikipedia or any other reason?? Plz reply .see Chauharmal and two more articles i created recently.see Department of Animal husbandry and Dairying & Tribal Co-operative Marketing Federation of India (TRIFED) Heba Aisha (talk) 13:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- The articles are at present in the mainspace of English Wikipedia. They will rise to the top of a Google search in time. Thank you for creating them :) No Swan So Fine (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Listed parks and gardens in Wiltshire
Hello Swan - I hope you are keeping well. When you created [[Category:Grade I listed parks and gardens in Wiltshire]] and [[Category:Grade II listed parks and gardens in Wiltshire]], you inexplicably overlooked [[Category:Grade II* listed parks and gardens in Wiltshire]]. What were you thinking of?! I now have need of exactly that category for Shute House, Donhead St Mary, a II* by Sir Geoffrey Jellicoe. I cannot work out how to create a category page. I really should know, but I don’t. Would you be able to assist? All the very best. KJP1 (talk) 21:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- It has been done. I've been creating them on an ad hoc basis...I much desire a series of lists of said gardens, but that shall be for our noble Wiki successors to create...What a beautiful article! I get most of my inspiration from Country Life these days. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Disloyal moved to draftspace
I moved Disloyal to the draftspace as I do not think it warrants a separate article from Michael_Cohen_(lawyer)#Publication_of_memoir at the moment. When it is more developed then please move back to the mainspace. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 40
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
- New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
- #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
- AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Comment request for ITN
Hello! I see you have positively reviewed my DYK nomination; thanks! Could you review (impartially, of course) my ITN nomination of the same article? Veverve (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Nicholas Wilder
Hello! Your submission of Nicholas Wilder at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! feminist (talk) | free Hong Kong 12:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
Merging content from Chelsea house collapse with Durham Place, Chelsea
I hope you don't mind if I put some details from the former article into the latter. I'll try to keep them from overwhelming the latter in terms of content. Autarch (talk) 10:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Brilliant work, thank you! I do think a light merge would work best. There's so much fascinating local history around there. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 41
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
- New partnership: Taxmann
- WikiCite
- 1Lib1Ref 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Champ and Major
Hello! Your submission of Champ and Major at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI No Swan So Fine/Archive 10,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello No Swan So Fine,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Stylisations of song titles
I'm sorry for assuming you were a new user in my revert summary on Marjorie (song), but I am confused as to how you have been here for 15 years and created as many articles as you have but aren't aware of MOS:CT and MOS:TMRULES meaning we don't stylise a title, even if an artist insists their work should be printed how they insist (like Lady Gaga in saying Artpop should always be in all caps). That's the reason why there was a parenthesised note in the first few words saying it is stylised in lowercase—so we don't print the stylised title everywhere in accordance with our rules about capitalisation on Wikipedia. Ss112 21:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- I guess 99.9% of the articles I've created/edited have proper capitalistion so I found it refreshing to find one in lowercase. No Swan So Fine (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Not censored
Hi No Swan So Fine, I noticed you made an edit labelled "+ not censored" on the Led By Donkeys page. Since the f**k is within a quotation from the Birmingham Mail, and the paper actually has it printed as f**k, it seems to me we should have f**k business and not fuck business. Or do you see it differently? Edwininlondon (talk) 16:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- I think you might be right, although we are of course reproducing their censorship of the word. The asterisks just seem incongruous after their prior omission, as it clear that there is no ambiguity in regard to which word was used. Pleasure to meet you, anyway! You've written some incredible articles, and made some solid FAs. No Swan So Fine (talk) 17:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Nice to meet you too. And thanks for the kind words. If you ever have any articles you'd like people to review (FAC or GAN or PR), just let me know. Edwininlondon (talk) 18:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Season's greetings
|
Merry Christmas |
| Wishing you and your family a safe and happy Christmas and new year. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Hello, No Swan So Fine! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Linguist111talk 23:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
Happy New Year!
|
Happy New Year! |
Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
American educators
While it could be true that It's Elementary: Talking About Gay Issues in School was the first such film for American educators, I can't find anything that states that. SL93 (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I understand your distinction. I know how frustrating sourcing can be. I'm looking forward to seeing it on the front page! Some fascinating films in that GLAAD template. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- What I mean is that the approved hook is "...that It's Elementary: Talking About Gay Issues in School is the first film that provides educators with information on how to prevent discrimination against gay people?" and the source states "first of its kind". I'm not seeing anything for it being the first only for American educators rather than in general. SL93 (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've changed it back. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you and thanks for adding a new category. I agree about those films being fascinating. I was looking for similar articles to create or expand because my best friend is gay and I discovered this film on that template. SL93 (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I created Gay Life (TV series) many years ago, it was an exhilarating and tragic era. No Swan So Fine (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you and thanks for adding a new category. I agree about those films being fascinating. I was looking for similar articles to create or expand because my best friend is gay and I discovered this film on that template. SL93 (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've changed it back. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- What I mean is that the approved hook is "...that It's Elementary: Talking About Gay Issues in School is the first film that provides educators with information on how to prevent discrimination against gay people?" and the source states "first of its kind". I'm not seeing anything for it being the first only for American educators rather than in general. SL93 (talk) 19:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/White House horseshoe pit at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- No Swan So Fine, please don't forget to take care of this one way or the other. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I added a QPQ yesterday. Many thanks for keeping an eye on this. Happy new year! No Swan So Fine (talk) 17:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Bill hopper (furniture)
Hello! Your submission of Bill hopper (furniture) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew🐉(talk) 18:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burdett-Coutts Memorial Sundial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordova.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Love for Sale FAC
Thank you for defending the article. However, perhaps it is best not to engage with that editor any further. It was recommended to me to notify one of the project coordinators instead, as I have done here. isento (talk) 15:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- If you can, a review of your own would be appreciated though. I've had nominations go stale with too few feedback within what's usually a month-and-a-half window, so I had to ask. isento (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Sarah Thomas DYK
I really liked your DYK on Sarah Thomas! You had a very interesting hook, and the alternative was cool too. Thanks for making that and the article about her! IllQuill (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much @IllQuill:! I met her randomly while wandering around this incredible resource. Just try random keywords, it's fascinating seeing the day-to-day concerns of the past. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations
Congratulations! With 15,001 total views (and 1,250 views per hour), your hook on the White House swimming pool is one of the most viewed DYK hooks this month. Accordingly, it has been placed in the list at DYKSTATS January. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 42
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
- New EBSCO collections now available
- 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
- Library Card input requested
- Libraries love Wikimedia, too!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
Congratulations
Your DYK hook about Salvador Dalí's lobster dress, and the designer's order to hold the mayo, received 7,182 page views (599 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the one of most viewed hooks during the month of February and has thus earned a place on the February stats list. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Double congratulations. Your hook about High Point, Bradford, and it comparison to a Japanese giant robot, also made the grade with 11,893 page views. Cbl62 (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revenge dress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord Palumbo.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi No Swan So Fine! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 00:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Saw this because of your edit to list of dresses which I have watchlisted. What an interesting read, thank you for creating it! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! There's some fascinating biographical yarns to be told through costume history. No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure if you've seen this, but this Commons image purports to be a free-license image of the dress, if it's of any use to you. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos: Thank you so much, I've just found the article on Italian and Spanish Wikis! No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:47, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cheers! I thought it was a shame not to have an image so I went poking around on Commons with my fingers crossed and I was pleasantly surprised :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's astonishing really, the content on commons in plain sight, especially the uncategorised stuff. So many wonderful images. No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, totally! Quite a lot of the images on inuit clothing were dug up from Commons and sometimes I was just blown away at the gems I found in obscure categories. Especially the historical stuff! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Eric Francis (architect)
Used a nice image of yours here, Eric Francis (architect). Oh for the days when we could actually travel! Take care. KJP1 (talk) 12:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah wonderful work! I used up a lot of shoe leather conquering Rhiwbina Garden Village. Have you seen these proto-modernist villas at Glyn Cory Garden Village? They look like out-of-place artifacts! No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK Review for Molly
Could you help? Your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Molly Clutton-Brock got in a mess over the image. I have removed the image but it needs someone to retick and I'm guessing you could base this on your previous review. If too busy ... then thx anyway Victuallers (talk) 23:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
- News and notes: Maher stepping down
- Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video
- In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house
- News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia
- Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day
- Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?
- Gallery: What is Black history and culture?
Shouldn't that be Category:Daily Mail and General Mistrust? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- They are imperfect scribes, as indeed are we. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but good to have someone to blame. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations
Your DYK hook about Princess Diana's revenge dress and Prince Charles' televised interview about infidelity drew a combined 23,710 page views (1,976 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the third most viewed hook for the month of March and ranks as the sixth most viewed hook (so far) of 2021, as shown at Top hooks of 2021. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 17:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 42
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
- New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
- 1Lib1Ref
- Library Card
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Simon Dolan
Take disputes to the Talk page please. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Lewis (baseball)
Thank you for the kind words, NSSF... I still remember the nominator saying that he was "irked" because the player's first name still had not been discovered. He or she apparently had no clue about how research works. Mandsford 12:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Death of Robert Fuller for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Robert Fuller (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Question about page Marguerite Sir
Hi! I translated the page of Marguerite Sir (Sirvins) earlier today, and I noticed that in all primary sources I could find, including the academic Lucienne Peiry who has given numerous conferences about her use the name Sirvins (except that one page on Art Brut). I wonder if referring to her by the name 'Sir' might have been a mistake made by Art Brut? I don't know however how to proceed in this situation. As you created the page, I hoped you could help!
Thank you! E mln e (talk) 04:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks @E mln e:. Your recent contributions have been incredible. It's such an obvious error, I wish I'd noticed it sooner! I've moved the page, the old name will be a redirect. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'm just glad to help where I can :) E mln e (talk) 19:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
- News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan
- News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond
- Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise
- From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
- Obituary: Yoninah
- From the editor: What else can we say?
- Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees
- Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack
Hi. I found this article about a Gershwin song, which you created a long time ago. It's unsourced and has been tagged for notability since 2015. It indeed doesn't seem to meet WP:NSONG, but I could be wrong about that. Do you think you would be able to add sources to it to resolve the notability issue? Lennart97 (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for reminding me of that gem, @Lennart97:! I've expanded it with academic sources. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, wow! That's a very impressive expansion. Great work, thank you! Lennart97 (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 09:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
Thanks
Thanks for starting Statue of Billie Holiday! I saw Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California) was just nominated for deletion, if you have any interest in helping to expand. Either way, happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 13:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks @Another Believer:...It's you who deserve a statue for all this monumental work! I've included you in Billie's DYK. Do you have NYT archive access? I created Broadway Answers Selma but can't read the following days report in the NYT [3]. No Swan So Fine (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- No Swan So Fine, Thanks for your kind words. I cannot copy and paste the text from the NYT article, but I am able to view a larger version of the document. I could copy and paste a screenshot into an email to you, if that's helpful. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I assume this link does not work for you? ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- It doesn't unfortunately :( If you could email that it would be amazing. My link is on the left. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 43
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
- New Library Card designs
- 1Lib1Ref May
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1896 establishments in South Africa
A tag has been placed on Category:1896 establishments in South Africa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Grey Wings, Ashtead
Hi @No Swan So Fine:
I have recently been working to expand the Ashtead article. I came across the Grey Wings, Ashtead page which you created. I wondered if perhaps this should be merged into the main article on the village, which now has a 'Notable buildings and landmarks' section? Looking at the statistics, it would appear that the Grey Wings page has attracted very few views - a little more than one every two days - and I thought that the house would gain more visibility if it was part of a larger article.
Would you be willing to support a merger of the material from Grey Wings, Ashtead into the main Ashtead page?
Best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 20:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Mertbiol:, the Ashtead page looks incredible! Thanks for your great expansions. I think ideally we would have a Listed buildings in Mole Valley article, but you're right about the greater visibility on the main Ashtead page, feel free to merge it and keep the categories on a redirect. I'd be very grateful if you could find any more references for it as well. All the best No Swan So Fine (talk) 18:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @No Swan So Fine: Thanks very much for your prompt response. I will go ahead and formally propose a merge anyway, for the sake of collegiality. I'm not expecting anyone to object, so I will aim to carry out the actual move in a week's time. Just FYI, the following pages already exist: Grade I listed buildings in Surrey, Grade II* listed buildings in Mole Valley. (There are only four Grade I listed buildings in Mole Valley.) There probably is a case for adding a Grade II listed buildings in Mole Valley article in the future. Thanks and best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 19:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK
Hi @No Swan So Fine, you had approved one of my DYK nominations, it was my first time, anyway, I noticed it hadn't yet appeared on the homepage, when is it queued for to show? Or What's the next process? -- Tame (talk) 11:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! It's already been moved to the area for approved articles, and barring any last minute changes should be moved to a preparation area. I'll follow it's progress and try and keep you informed. Great work once again! No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WilsonChariotIsrael.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WilsonChariotIsrael.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Sally Conforte
Thanks for your work on Sally Conforte. Good stuff!Owilli2019 (talk) 23:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Joseph Conforte
Thanks for your work on Joe's page!Owilli2019 (talk) 23:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Books & Bytes – Issue 45
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
- Library design improvements continue
- New partnerships
- 1Lib1Ref update
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello No Swan So Fine,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
hahahah
some would frown quite seriously at one of the added projects - as if the subject and project are like fish on a bicycle - but I darent state the obvious... JarrahTree 12:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- We are all imperfect scribes, IMO! No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- indeed - I am sure the heisenbergian uncertainty brought about by wellington's contemplations in the perishers concur with such assertions... JarrahTree 13:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- As Zhou Enlai never said, it's "too early to tell". No Swan So Fine (talk) 13:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- indeed - I am sure the heisenbergian uncertainty brought about by wellington's contemplations in the perishers concur with such assertions... JarrahTree 13:10, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- shukran to such knowledgable replies - the sentiment no doubt raised by events in 1927 JarrahTree 13:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Best Sex I've Ever Had
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Best Sex I've Ever Had you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Best Sex I've Ever Had
The article Best Sex I've Ever Had you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Best Sex I've Ever Had for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Best Sex I've Ever Had
The article Best Sex I've Ever Had you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Best Sex I've Ever Had for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 46
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
- Library design improvements deployed
- New collections available in English and German
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
Nomination of 2021 Milan airplane crash for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Milan airplane crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sky Pool, London
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sky Pool, London you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sky Pool, London
The article Sky Pool, London you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sky Pool, London for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi No Swan So Fine,
Thank you very much for your kind comment on my talk page. An editor (not me) has nominated the photo from directly beneath the pool for Featured Picture status on commons:Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Cmglee_London_Embassy_Gardens_pool_polariser.jpg.
I'd most appreciate your support, which will also get the Sky Pool article more attention if it gets featured.
Thanks in advance,
cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 02:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Your GA nomination of Sky Pool, London
The article Sky Pool, London you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sky Pool, London for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
Books & Bytes – Issue 47
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
- On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
- Search tool deployed
- New My Library design improvements
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
Merry Christmas
| File:Christmas tree in field.jpg | Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!! |
|
Hello, warm wishes to you and your family throughout the holiday season. Hope you are well. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
Your GA nomination of Tina Green
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tina Green you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)