User talk:RightCowLeftCoast/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

WikiProject C-SPAN?

Greetings fellow Wikipedia editor -

I am leaving you this note because I have reason to believe that you are interested in C-SPAN. (I may have made this assumption based on your C-SPAN user box, or perhaps for some other reason.) If this is not an interest of yours, please feel free to read no further and delete this message.

If you are in fact someone who is interested in C-SPAN, then let me put forward an idea that I have been kicking around for a while. What if we started a C-SPAN WikiProject?

The parameters of this (potential) project are up for discussion, but it could include some or all of the following (as well as things that may occur to you that have not occurred to me):

• Creation, maintenance, and improvement of articles and lists directly related to C-SPAN and its programming.
• Use of C-SPAN programming in citations for various topics
• Inclusion of unique and _targeted C-SPAN video links for various articles. (Doing this with respect for established guidelines at Wikipedia:External links.) (Example: If you are interested in the submarine USS Wyoming (SSBN-742), then having easy access to the eight hours of programming taped while a C-SPAN crew were guests on that submarine could also be of interest to you.)
• Inclusion of (and possible further creation of) templated links such as {{C-SPAN|laurabush}}, that will easily take article readers to a link of all C-SPAN Video Library links for the person about whom the article is about.
• What else?

I don't know exactly how far we may want to go, nor in what directions, but I do believe (as I have long noted on my user page) that C-SPAN and Wikipedia are both...

...fantastic vehicles for the free exchange of ideas and information in a non-sound-bite manner, and they both invite the participation of any parties (expert or amateur) who are interested in taking the time to absorb and/or contribute to the ideas and information offered. C-SPAN and Wikipedia go together like peanut butter and jelly, and I want to help give other Wiki users easy access to the great work that C-SPAN has done on a variety of topics.

Now, I should mention that I have never started a WikiProject before, and I do not know the best way to go about it. (Perhaps one of you do?) Let me offer one of my sandbox pages, User:KConWiki/sandbox/Wikiproject C-SPAN?, as a gathering area for comments until such time as we gather enough steam to start our own WikiProject page.

Thanks for reading this far, and I hope that you will give some consideration as to whether this is something we ought to attempt. Please feel free to pass this message on to others you know whom might be interested, and please let me know your thoughts and comments.

KConWiki (talk) 02:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

From time to time I do enjoy watching C-SPAN, as I can be a policy wonk at times. I have linked to C-SPAN videos in the past for use as reliable sources, but beyond that what else will this Wikiproject seek to achieve?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japanese occupation of the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Jose Antonio Vargas". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 10 April 2013.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 00:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. User:MiszaBot III (talk) 16:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Beeblebrox (talk) 01:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, I am human and thus fallible, but I hope that I will try to be as error-less as possible in wielding this responsibility that has been bestowed upon me.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Women's history editathon

Hey - Sorry for the late notice, but since you have yourself tagged as living in the Bay Area, I thought you might appreciate notification that we’re having an event Saturday! It’ll be held at Hoyt Hall, an all-women's house of the Berkeley Student Cooperative from 3 to 6 pm tomorrow. The main event page is here. Anyone is welcome to show up, but we’re expecting a significant number of people to come who have literally never edited Wikipedia before. If you’re an experienced Wikipedian who would be able to provide useful help to some of the newbies, your presence would be especially appreciated (and it might be a good idea for you to show up at 2 or 2:30 instead of three. Thanks, Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC) I’m AWB’ing this message to all Wikipedians who have tagged themselves in the bay area. I’m sorry if the message isn’t of interest to you; feel free to delete it. I’ll be unlikely to send future messages in a similar way, but if really don’t want to receive future messages of this sort, please let me know.

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Jose Antonio Vargas, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:PhilKnight (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Moved your comment

Hey,

Just wanted to let you know that I moved one of your comments to make the RfC flow a little better. Hope you don't mind! NickCT (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Do not mind at at all. Thanks for the notice.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Cayucas relisted

Hi - since you were active in a previous AfD discussion, I thought you might want to know that Cayucas has been relisted, since there are now additional references that arguably establish notability. Floatjon (talk) 20:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Vance Peterson at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

tb

Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Image_question.
Message added — -dainomite   02:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(I know you have WP:DTTR linked on your talk page but I just wanted to be sure you saw the reply before the conversation got archived)

unit histories

not really sure why the concept on an index is so hard to grasp, or why a series of articles cant be linked to an index, I dont understand why everyone is hell bent on de linking everything. but I see a certain communist is bent on furthering his hate america first agenda, by deleting everything he can, on any made up excuse he can. the insidious nature of these deletions has finally proven to me that wikipeda is nothing mor than a communist propagand machine. Brian in denver (talk) 18:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments Brian in denver. Have you read the second paragraph of WP:Galleries, which is the Wikipedia rule I am proceeding in accordance with? As I told you some time ago, this material is great, but it is actually supposed to be on *Commons*, not *English Wikipedia*. There, other people who do not read English, amongst others, can access it more easily. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Asian American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asiatic

List of post-Vietnam Medal of Honor recipients (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Posthumous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.

I appreciate the Socratic barnstar. As for civility, some posters make it difficult but I'll continue to do my best. BTW, you've got an interesting user and talk page here. VictorD7 (talk) 03:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. 06:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Hanhwe.kim (talk) 06:38, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology.
Message added Zia Khan 11:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2013 Wikinic

	Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park
	You are invited to the third Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there! —howcheng {chat} 02:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
	If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite.

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012 Benghazi attack may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

My RFA

Greetings, I just wanted to let you know I answered your questions at my RFA. Kumioko (talk) 00:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

RFA question

Hi, for your information. I started a discussion here about your inappropriate question at Kumioko's RFA. Garion96 (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Third Opinion Service Award

		The Third Opinion Award
		Thank you for your service to the Third Opinion Project. By helping there, you are contributing to making Wikipedia a nicer and more peaceful place to work. Again, thank you very, very much. — TransporterMan (TALK) 15:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

(Just FYI, this award is given to editors with more than 50 edits at the project with at least one edit in the last six months. You are the 13th individual recipient. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC))

Thanks. I appreciate the recognition.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth Colbert Busch

I saw your exchange with the user who closed the discussion. Should it be disputed at Wikipedia:Deletion review? Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 16:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

My understanding is that it is used for restoring deleted articles, not for re-opening closed AfDs, I will take a look if it is an option though. If you can do the same, I would appreciate it.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

I have made a further response to the closing non-admin. Perhaps WP:DRV is the proper course regarding challenging the closure.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Vance Peterson

Harrias ^talk 00:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Google Books

Noticed your book addition of a Google book reference at United States you may find it easier to run the links through Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books first. It will give a short URL and not disclose the country from which your editing from and hides the information about your browsing choices.Moxy (talk) 21:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Soriano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2nd Armored Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your work on the Diplomat Rfc! Best. --Kleinzach 23:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem. It is my opinion that the closed RfC will not be the last time that this issue comes up, but it maybe a while (say six months to a year) before another move to change WP:DIPLOMAT occurs.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

RFA

Hi RightCowLeftCoast! I just wanted to stop by and thank you for your questions - they made me think, and I appreciated the opportunity to try and answer them. :) I don't know if I could answer them in the way you were looking for, but I enjoyed working through them. - Bilby (talk) 13:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:PORNBIO

Hi RightCowLeftCoast, per your vote in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Smiles‎, my rationale was "She appears to fail WP:PORNBIO as she was never nominated for an individual award" as WP:PORNBIO says (stress mine): "Has won a well-known and significant industry award, or has been nominated for such an award several times. Nominations and awards in scene-related and ensemble categories are excluded from consideration.". If I missed an AVN Award in a non-scene-related/ensamble category please add it to the article, I'll consequently withdraw my nomination for deletion. My best, Cavarrone (talk) 08:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Smiles.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Consensus can change, and I for one think that this current restriction in PORNBIO is too restrictive. From what I've read so far on the history of changes to PORNBIO over time, it's apparent to me that those changes were made by some, in part, to overly restrict the number of articles on Wikipedia that dealt with pornography, which isn't a particularly fair thing to do IMHO. Guy1890 (talk) 20:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Surely it can change, and in general terms I consider some aspects of PORNBIO too restrictive (even if probably not the same aspects you're referring). What is patently wrong is that Mia Smiles currently meets the current PORNBIO award criterium as said by RightCowLeftCoast in the related AfD, except he's referring to an award not yet added to the article. Hey RightCowLeftCoast, could you clarify your vote? Cavarrone (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Happy Memorial Day RightCow

-dainomite   is wishing you a Happy Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!

Share this message by adding {{subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.

So today I was looking at userpages of folks on my watchlist (to say happy Memorial Day to them) and I never realized you were in the military before, crazy. Anywho, Happy Memorial Day RightCow. — -dainomite   20:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate the template, it's very nice. Please, remember those who have died in service to their country today, as that is whom we celebrate this day for; especially, Sergeant Robert P Lemiszki Jr. (USMC), Staff Sergeant Richwell Doria (USA), and Private First Class Angelo Zawaydeh (USA), and Sergeant Rafael Peralta (USMC).--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your Support!

Thank you for your support!

Phead128 (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

AFD repeat

An AFD you recently participated in earlier this month is back at AFD again. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Israeli Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2013 (2nd nomination) Dream Focus 08:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ladino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

The perils of copy-paste

I assume you meant to address your RFA questions to Mattythewhite, not Mattythewhite 2... Also, please don't take this as badgering as that's not my intention, but isn't Q12 redundant to Q's 2 and 3? Oldelpaso (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Larry Itliong

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 31st Infantry Regiment (United States) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

149th Armor Regiment (United States)

I noticed that the section on Bataan had a "expansion needed" tag in it, which is why I didn't assess it as B-class. Otherwise the article looks fine to me. You can ask for help at the assessment request page or the MILHIST talk page if you need additional help. Wild Wolf (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

I agree, I put the tag there. I am not saying that the article should have been rated B class, but that B2 should have been marked No, and B1 should have been marked yes; therefore the article would be C class. As all the content that is presently there is well cited, but that the coverage even if what is there is accurate to the reliable sources provided.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Soriano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Jim DeMint

Hi RightCowLeftCoast, thanks for taking a look at my suggested material for the "U.S. Representative" section of Jim DeMint's article. I found a couple of other sources that describe DeMint as a "staunch conservative" so I've provided those on the discussion page, if you'd like to check them out. If you think a different wording would be better, I'd be open to that, too. Thanks! Thurmant (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, I've updated the drafted section as you suggested. Can you take another look? Thanks! Thurmant (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Wiknic Poway / San Diego

Join us this Saturday for the Great American Wiknic!

	Great American Wiknic San Diego at Old Poway Park, Poway
	You are invited to the Wikipedia:Meetup/Poway/Wiknic/2013/ at Old Poway Park next to the Poway–Midland Railroad in Poway. We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck! :)

Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC and others.
I hope to meet you there! Jim1138 (talk) 08:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Tomorrow's Poway wiknic.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Jim1138 (talk) 02:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jim DeMint, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Metaforic article idea for improved Notability - seeking feedback

01:17, 5 June 2013 LFaraone (talk | contribs) deleted page Metaforic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaforic (2nd nomination))

I appreciate the attention LFaraone and yourself gave to deleting the above submission.

I am charged with pursuing the discovery and revelation of sufficient Notability to earn Metaforic inclusion.

It is not my intent to dispute, only to ask if a particular item might work, in addition to the BBC, as independent, reliable citation of notability. Rather than re-open the article, I thought maybe I could get a quick estimation of whether this newly-found source would make it worthwhile to re-open the article and its discussion. Since you are familiar with the article, I am placing the request here. If I have erred, please forgive my intrusion and guide me elsewhere.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

The source below contains several whitepapers to which metaforic contributed, as well as passing profiles and list mentions, etc. Would this be a notable source, and would this, in concert with the BBC, support inclusion? Mobey Forum - Mobile Financial Services www.mobeyforum.org/‎ A non-profit, global, financial industry-driven forum, whose mission is to encourage the use of mobile technology in financial services. About Us Mobey Forum is a non-profit, global, financial industry-driven ... About Mobey Forum Mobey Forum is the bank-led not-for-profit global leader in driving a sustainable and prosperous mobile financial services ecosystem. Established in 2000, it brings together leading financial institutions, mobile handset manufacturers and payment processors and vendors, committed to accelerating the mass-market deployment of user-friendly mobile financial services by promoting open and secure technology standards. MPOS Whitepaper (metaphoric is cited as a contributor here ) Metaforic is a member of the Mobey Security Task Force Mstrickeditor (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)mstrickeditor

Comic-Con!

Oh, I outed myself when it was time for my book to come out.[1] It was really the only way I could properly thank fellow Wikipedians and have it make any darn sense. Anyway, I do plan to attend the meetup, barring some surprise press conference I need to attend (unlikely but not impossible that Wednesday afternoon). I'm listed on 4 or 5 panels, I'm also involved with one I'm not supposed to talk about, and I'll moderate some I'm not listed on. When I get involved with a con, I leap into it wholeheartedly. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 20:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth II

The question posed at the Elizabeth II RfC, at which you commented, has been amended [2] to clarify a potential misunderstanding. Please re-visit the question and your comment and amend if necessary. Thanks. DrKiernan (talk) 17:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Murder article

Hi, I saw your post at requests for undeletion. I am willing to userfy the article if you want at any time, but to get it restored you'll have to go to DRV since the discussion had a clear consensus. You might find DRV to be amenable to a relist, since there has been a lot of coverage. We sometimes get these odd situations, (like here, for example) when the consensus on the Afd is clear but the community rejects the outcome of the discussion. This might be one of them, you never know. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vang Pao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Racial hoax

The article I was trying to think of was Racial hoax. Thanks for organizing the SDCC meetup! Jim1138 (talk) 04:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thankful that you were able to answer this at the meetup and so well. It was pretty horrifying to realize what I was asking you. And it might take years if I ever recover. I first heard this theory on Through the Wormhole in a segment titled "Is There A Superior Race?": the Linda Gottfredson video is not archived but here are the subtitles. Then it surfaced on Rachel Maddow, at 8:00 to about 9:30, Jason Richwine speaking for the American Enterprise Institute, and working for the Heritage Foundation against immigration reform. Richwine was, more or less precisely, reporting Gottfredson's Mainstream Science on Intelligence. Just shows to go ya that scientists are not always right, and that my brain will believe just about anything. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

RightCowLeftCoast, I have no doubt you can and will publish someday and be officially a reliable source. I join with Jim1138 to thank you very much for organizing this meetup! Nothing else in a long time made me think this hard. Well done, WP:RS! Cheers, -SusanLesch (talk) 15:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup

You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 04:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

SDCC Meetup

Thanks for hosting the San Diego Comic Con meetup! Jim1138 (talk) 09:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Inquiry about Invasion of Iraq article

Dear RightCowLeftCoast,

I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia and I would like to discuss with you regarding our changes to the "Invasion of Iraq" page.

If possible, I would like to know if you have watched the video clip of General Wesley Clark describing a memo shortly after 9/11 on attacking seven middle eastern countries which includes Iraq?

Secondly, I noticed that Richard Clarke's thoughts concerning the Bush administration prior intent to invade Iraq has also been removed from the page - even though it is consistent with General Clark's account. I would appreciate it if you can add Richard Clarke's statement back. The thing is that both of these men have served in some official capacity and their accounts completely contradict the discourse on the Wikipedia page. For this reason, it is worth noting that not a single mainstream media (CNN, ABC, FOX, NBC, CBC, etc) have reported on General Clark's account. I sent them a press release regarding this given his stature as a person who has served as a director on the Joint Chiefs of Staff and as the Supreme NATO Commander, surely they must be interested but no response. It seems that if the mainstream media does not report these things, then Wikipedia cannot mention any such thing in the lead section. So Wikipedia basically is an online representation of the mainstream media.

I'm not sure exactly what to do but I hope for your understanding.

Best, FACTCHECKER123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by FactChecker123 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Edward Soriano A-class Review

G'day, I've posted a few comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Edward Soriano. As you haven't yet responded, I made a few adjustments myself, but I wasn't able to deal with some of the content-related issues. If you are free, can you please return to the review and provide an update of how you are going? Given that the review has been open for two months, it is currently being considered for closing, but if you can demonstrate progress it may be able to remain open. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Apr to Jun 2013 Milhist content reviewing

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the period Apr-Jun 2013, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

I would love to talk to you.

Yeah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.19.162.224 (talk) 21:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup

Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) — Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 03:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

More Jim DeMint

Hi again RightCowLeftCoast. Back in June I think it was you who reviewed a draft section I wrote for the Jim DeMint article, and I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look at another new section I've written. I posted this on the talk page about a week ago but haven't had any editors respond. My guess is that there aren't many active editors watching this article.

Anyhow, if you wanted to take a look I have rewritten the Political positions section, which is currently tagged saying that it needs work. I've added my draft to the talk page. If you're not available that's fine too, just let me know and I'll look for other editors to review. Thanks! Thurmant (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demographics of Asian Americans

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Demographics of Asian Americans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 11:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit-a-thons at UC Riverside

The UCR Libraries are hosting three edit-a-thons focusing on their great special collections (science fiction, water resources, the Inland Empire and more) on Oct. 12, 2013, Oct. 26, 2013, and Nov. 23, 2013. Please participate if you can! Details and signup here. All are welcome, new and experienced editors alike! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 04:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Larry Itliong

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Larry Itliong you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 11:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demographics of Asian Americans

The article Demographics of Asian Americans you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Demographics of Asian Americans for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 17:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Larry Itliong

The article Larry Itliong you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Larry Itliong for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 22:52, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Americans, trying for a fresh and friendly discussion

Hello, RightCowLeftCoast. You have new messages at Talk:Americans.
Message added 01:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

N2e (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Jose Calugas' unidentified decoration

I have a probable identification for Jose Calugas' unidentified decoration, see Talk:Jose Calugas#New Information. AusTerrapin (talk) 15:15, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

SG

Seasonal Greetings

Visitor7 (talk) 20:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup in San Diego?

Hi RightCowLeftCoast, I am Sebastian Wallroth from Berlin, Germany, board member of Wikimedia Deutschland. I am visiting San Diego from February 3rd to February 8th, happily invited to a wedding. I would like to meet Wikipedians. Is there a chance for a Wiki Meetup in San Diego during the first week in February? --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 15:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

I have been less active recently, but I will see who is interested at the meetup page.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

I have created a discussion here to see whom would be interested: Wikipedia talk:Meetup/San Diego#February meetup.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)