Sesame119

April 2024

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Undetectable.ai, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Do not add primary sources and blacklisted/pernial sources, such as how you did. Comintell (talk) 02:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on undetectable.ai. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. If you tamper with this page again, you will likely be blocked from editing on Wikipedia. Comintell (talk) 13:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello Comintell,

I was wondering why you felt my changes to the page were not in alignment with Wikipedia standards. I used the same sources for the Devan Leos controversy as is on his own Wikipedia page and the controversies on Christian Perry are sourced from the Idaho court database. If there's anything I can do differently to make sure my section stays up please let me know, thank you. Sesame119 (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I stated this to you in April 2024, "Do not add primary sources and blacklisted/pernial sources, such as how you did." I should have linked you Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research. Still, in a span of nearly two months, you've taken no time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies, or contribute positively to Wikipedia.

Not only have you failed to inform yourself and learn proper practices, you haven't engaged with the community, or done any other edits other than the same edit you've attempted to publish numerous times.

Does this make sense to you now? I've now explained your mistakes 3 separate times, and the entire encyclopedia policy is available to you for your reading pleasure and consumption. Now I hope you understand your mistakes here, and my frustration. Comintell (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at undetectable.ai. You have added information not verified by a reliable source. Your account appears to be SPA Comintell (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Draft:StealthGPT, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: StealthGPT (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:StealthGPT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello Pythoncoder,

Can you please cite the sections of the page that you felt were personally biased. That was not my intention in creating this page and I would like to resolve this as quickly as possible. Sesame119 (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Sesame119! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)