Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appium (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in RS to meet GNG. —swpb^T 15:51, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - More than enough coverage in reliable sources [1]. Meatsgains (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I nominated for speedy but admin removed since article had changed since last AfD. The awards it has received are not notable, but that is expected for a niche product. No other real coverage. Already explained on talk page that the other refs do not meet WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Selenium is a niche product too. What about deleting Selenium entry too? The only difference is that selenium is fot testing web on desktop windows or linux and appium is for testing applications or web on android or iOSVatadoshu^french 11:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Selenium is a niche product, but it meets WP:GNG so there's not need to delete. See WP:OSE for a refutation of your argument. However, if you would like to nominate it for deletion, I'd be happy to participate in that discussion, but be sure to do WP:BEFORE prior to nominating. Walter Görlitz (talk) 12:58, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Walter Görlitz WP:GNG? selenium sources are not very good: groups.google.com, https://newcircle.com (http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/newcircle.com); and www.aosabook.org (http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/aosabook.org). I do not find notability in selenium sources even if i think it is notable). This one http://www.atmarkit.co.jp/ait/articles/1506/02/news017.html or this one http://www.infoq.com/cn/news/2015/07/mtsc-appium are better rank than that selenium sources. A book on it https://books.google.fr/books?id=bQoDCAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=appium&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiznp2w0tLPAhVFOxoKHabLAx8Q6AEIMTAB#v=onepage&q=appium&f=false and http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/appium-tool with good alexia rank http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/indiatimes.comVatadoshu^french 15:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Already explained on the article's talk page. A self-published book, a group discussion, etc. Perhaps you should read GNG before suggesting anything again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Vatadoshu^french 15:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC) (I am the creator of the page )[reply]
- It should be noted that the above comment is from the page creator. —swpb^T 12:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.