Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DipTrace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

DipTrace

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

DipTrace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consists of promotional content only. Pancho507 (talk) 00:41, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

• Keep - I am appalled that an article such as "DipTrace" is nominated for deletion. "DipTrace" has 610,000 results shown on Google and numerous results on YouTube. Yes, the article needs to be improved, but that's NOT enough to warrant a deletion request. Also User:Pancho507 broke reference links during an overly agreesive edit, which still needs to be fixed. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

• Comment See WP:GNUM. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 17:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

• It has been 5 days, and User:Pancho507 still has not fixed the links in the article. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 17:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• Keep: A clearly notable software package. The nominator should carefully study WP:DEL-REASON to learn what kind of problems in an article mean that it should be deleted and what kind of problems in an article mean that the problems should be fixed. (Full disclosure: I am a former DipTrace user. I still think DipTrace is a good product but in my opinion KiCad is better.) --Guy Macon (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.