Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (economics)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (WP:SNOW) -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dominant group (economics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another Dominantgroupcruft WP:SYNTH violation, none of the sources join Dominant group and the topic together. Cerejota (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. —202.124.74.247 (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Again, this is just someone using the "find" function on a bunch of economics papers and gluing what they find together without regard to whether "dominant group" is actually a thing in economics. Insofar as it is a thing, it's the sociological term - economics does not have its own definition - as used in section 1, and the other sections are useless. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Dominance (economics) covers the topic, and there is nothing here worth merging into there. -- 202.124.75.81 (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article is pure WP:SYNTH-by-Google (and not especially coherent). Sławomir Biały (talk) 21:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OR. Glrx (talk) 19:07, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Grab bag of unrelated bits. Binksternet (talk) 04:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per AN/I thread, SYNTH article created for strange 'research' project Jebus989✰ 14:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.