Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Luis Small

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. Withdrawn under protest; a low-level "named chair" should not automatically mean PROF is met, but I am clearly in the minority. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Luis Small

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG: references provided are all primary, and most of what I'm finding online are either one-sentence mentions or variations on "according to Small,..." Not finding anything to suggest anything other than MILL status. Primefac (talk) 01:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep as nomination consists of only "primary sources listed", but this is what confirms information from the source and field; importantly also, he has a named chair at UniversityChicago and another at Harvard, instantly satisfying WP:PROF. SwisterTwister talk 19:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep holders of named chairs pass notability guidelines for academics. We do need better sourcing though.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep per WP:PROF#C1 (heavily cited publications on Google scholar), #C3 (member of Sociological Research Association), and #C5 (the named chair). —David Eppstein (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.