Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 18

< February 17	February 19 >

February 18

File:Mariska Hargitay in 2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mariska Hargitay in 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copyvio. Numerous other occurrences online. Considering editors image contribution history, I have to assume bad faith here unless that can send proof to WikiMedia. Dismas|^(talk) 03:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete The image at http://www.bestcelebritydress.com/mariska-hargitay-celebrity-dress-at-sag-awards-2011-red-carpet appears to be identical. Eeekster (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lake of No Return.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake of No Return.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Copyrighted mark - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 04:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tomharmon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomharmon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious copyright Secret ^account 05:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gig Machine EDITED.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gig Machine EDITED.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

The file name indicates that this is a derivative work, although it is not clear which image it is a derivative work of. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UP Carillon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep This looks like a building and from my looking around the web, I would say it's a building. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 07:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:UP Carillon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Is this a building ({{FoP-USonly|the Philippines}}) or an artwork? Even if it is an artwork, it might be possible to keep it: the image is heavily used and it is likely that at least some article would allow fair use of it. Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is apparently a result of an improper move of File:Barrel barbeque 3.jpg: the file was duplicated by a different user and the old file got an F1 deletion. However, this means that the original upload history is missing. The licence (implying that the one who performed the improper move) took the photo looks wrong. Could any admin check the file information page of the original file and at least move over the correct author information? I'd like to move the picture to Commons, but it would be more practical to do that from the original file since it would give a better source for Commons. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We could also do it like on File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg to get the history along. --MGA73 (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! Could the same also be done with the other ones below? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --MGA73 (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barrel barbecue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrel barbecue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See #File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg above. Replace the "c" in the file name with a "q" to identify the source image. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barrel barbecue 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrel barbecue 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See #File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg above. Replace the "c" in the file name with a "q" to identify the source image. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barrel barbecue 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barrel barbecue 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See #File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg above. Replace the "c" in the file name with a "q" to identify the source image. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CTJLogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CTJLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The file/logo is taken from a website. Uploader added "The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification.". I find no basis for that on the website. However the logo may qualify for {{PD-textlogo}}. MGA73 (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

All images uploaded by User:Lyndsayruell

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete for now; to be restored upon receipt of adequate permission via OTRS.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 11:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AjiMochica.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

And all other images uploaded by User:Lyndsayruell.

The text at this file page says "Larco Museum Collection. Free Use.". Do we have permission of that? Other files have a similar text. The uploader does not seem to be active anymore. A few of the uploads by this user has been deleted as copyvios - I did not check why.

I think a few of the files uploaded as own work should be safe to keep. MGA73 (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded from Larco Museum Collection

Images uploaded as own work

Images uploaded from Larco Museum Collection - now on Commons

Images uploaded as own work - now on Commons

Discussion

I also made a notice on Commons: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:AjiMochica.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the discussion take place on Commons since the files should all be moved there if the result is keep. --MGA73 (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a notice that I got a mail from the museum. See more on Commons and on OTRS ticket OTRS:6463518 #2012022410003783. --MGA73 (talk) 11:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, for those of you that don't have OTRS: An email came in on the 24th, and we sent back something roughly along the lines of "we'd like for you to be more explicit/specific about licensing" about two hours later. Personally, based on what they've said so far, we ought to give it a few more days before we consider deletion. The most likely outcome is that they write back and I spend an hour tagging all of the files with an OTRS ticket template and everything's golden. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at the OTRS and agree, lets leave this open, so i'm officially extending this for another 7 days from the original nomination time and we'll look at it then. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 08:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The museum confirmed that she worked on the museum so I think that the files mentioned above as "own work" are 100 % safe.

As for the rest of the file I hope for a positive response soon. --MGA73 (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ADVL.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADVL.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unable to verify authorship or permission. Kelly ^hi! 20:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Barbie through time.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbie through time.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of toys. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Number 1 Ponytail Barbie II.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Number 1 Ponytail Barbie II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vintage Number 3 Ponytail Barbie I.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintage Number 3 Ponytail Barbie I.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vintagebarbie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintagebarbie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photos of toys (file overwritten). They count as derivative works according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Number 6 Ponytail Barbie red hair.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Number 6 Ponytail Barbie red hair.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vintage Swirl Ponytail Barbie Brunette.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintage Swirl Ponytail Barbie Brunette.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paul Huson (Headshot).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep There is way too much assumption that things are wrong here. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 08:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Huson (Headshot).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" (web resolution), without exif, user with a single upload - probably mistake Bulwersator (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arad Israel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arad Israel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unable to locate original source. Kelly ^hi! 21:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It says "On Hebrew Wikipedia as Arad041.jpg". And he:file:Arad041.jpg is the same image. Google Translate suggests that it is fine, so I moved it over. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'm not sure why it wasn't coming up for me on he. Kelly ^hi! 22:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WilliamofWarenne.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WilliamofWarenne.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image cannot date to the "1000s". I doubt the actual stained-glass windows dates over a century - who knows. Since it's a fairly good-quality coloured image I suspect it is not out-of-copyright due to age. Considering the uploader's talkpage of about one hundred deleted images, I'm certain this image was just pulled off the net without much thought. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a chain of guesses, this may be the glass of William de Warenne from the Gundrada Chapel of the Church of St John the Baptist, Southover, Lewes, which would be on the east wall, and here attributed [1] to Jessie Mary Jacob, 1930 (died 1933). (But we really need something better than a chain of guesses to determine copyright status and if in doubt, better safe . . . ). Agricolae (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gulf Oil Corporation Small.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gulf Oil Corporation Small.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

"Date Unknown" but tagged as PD due to expired copyright. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 23:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:William Weightman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Weightman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Daniel Willis James.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daniel Willis James.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Elias Hasket Derby.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elias Hasket Derby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:James J. Stillman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:James J. Stillman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"Date circa 1910" and "This file is in the public domain because its copyright has expired in the United States and those countries with a copyright term of no more than the life of the author plus 100 years." Bulwersator (talk) 23:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment {{PD-old-100}} is unlikely for a photo from "circa 1910"; the author would have had to die very soon after taking the photo. There is no proof of any pre-1923 publication (as stated by the other template). A 1927 publication is given. 1927+28 = 1955, so the copyright would have had to be renewed in 1955 (if I've understood the copyright system correctly). I've tried searching [2][3] for "Stillman" and "Robeson" without finding anything. I've searched [4] (which searches through all years) for "James Stillman" and "Anna Robeson Burr" without finding anything. Thus, I would guess that the 1927 publication is {{PD-US-no renewal}}, but copyright renewals are tricky and I think it's hard to know if I'm searching the records in the correct way, so it would be nice if someone else could comment my searching. Amazon suggests that the publication is a hardcover book. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.