Talk:eng

Request for verification

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Rfv-sense: abbreviation, in English, in lowercase, for "English" and "England". Note the ISO code is already covered under ==Translingual==. -- Visviva 10:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

How about rfd-redundant then? I mean it exists in English doesn't it? So it needs an rfd not an rfv right? Mglovesfun (talk) 06:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, I assumed the definition was claiming that an English abbreviation existed independently of ISO -- that, say, in older dictionaries or somewhere "English" might be denoted as "eng(.)" rather than "Eng(.)" Even if that isn't what was meant, it seems plausible enough to be worth an RFV. -- Visviva 07:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

RFV failed, section removed. —Ruakh_TALK 01:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)