La Kapuĉa parulio, Wilsonia citrina, estas birdospecio de la familio de Paruliedoj kaj de la genro Wilsonia kiu enhavas tri speciojn de birdoj kun flavaj subaj partoj kaj nigraj kapomarkoj.

Kiel legi la taksonomionVikipedio:Kiel legi la taksonomion
Kiel legi la taksonomion
Kapuĉa parulio
Kapuĉa parulio
Kapuĉa parulio
Biologia klasado
Regno: Animaloj Animalia
Filumo: Ĥorduloj Chordata
Klaso: Birdoj Aves
Ordo: Paseroformaj Passeriformes
Familio: Paruliedoj Parulidae
Genro: Wilsonia
Specio: 'W. citrina'
Wilsonia citrina
(Boddaert, 1783)
Konserva statuso
{{{220px}}}
Konserva statuso: Malplej zorgiga
Aliaj Vikimediaj projektoj
vdr

Ĝi reproduktiĝas en orienta Nordameriko nome en orienta Usono kaj en plej suda Kanado, (Ontario). Ĝi estas migranta specio, kiu vintras en Centrameriko kaj Karibio. La Kapuĉa parulio estas tre rara vaganto en okcidentan Eŭropon.

Aspekto

redakti
 
Ino ĉe nesto

La Kapuĉa parulio havas senmarkan olivverdecbrunan dorson kaj tre flavajn subajn partojn. La eksteraj vostoplumoj havas blankecajn nuancojn. Maskloj havas nigran kapuĉon (kio nomigas la specion) kiu ĉirkaŭas la flavan vizaĝon komponita ĉefe el mallarĝa krono, pli larĝa al nuko kaj ĉe la gorĝareo kaj mallarĝa kolumo; la ino havas olivverdecan kronon kiu ne etendas al la frunto, orelareo aŭ gorĝo. La tre flava vizaĝo kune kun la tre flavaj subaj partoj nomigas la specion en la latina scienca nomo kiel citrina, tio estas je la koloro de citronoj. En la flava vizaĝo ege kontrastas la nigra okulo. Maskloj akiras sian kapuĉon je la 9–12 monatoj de aĝo; pli junaj birdoj estas esence identaj al (kaj facile konfuzataj kun) inoj[1]. La kanto estas serio de muzikecaj notoj pli malpli kiel: ŭita ŭita ŭitjuu La alvoko de tiuj birdoj estas laŭta ĉip. La beko estas grizeca kaj la kruroj rozkolorecaj.

Kutimoj

redakti

Tiuj nearktisaj birdoj manĝas insektojn, kiuj ofte troviĝas en malalta vegetaĵaro aŭ kaptiĝas dumfluge. La reproduktaj habitatoj de la Kapuĉa parulio estas larĝfoliaj arbaroj kun densa subkreskaĵaro. Tiuj birdoj nestumas en malaltaj areoj de arbustaro; la ino demetas 3-5 ovojn en tasforma nesto. La Kapuĉaj parulioj estas ofte viktimoj de nestoparazitado fare de la Brunkapa molotro, ĉefe kie la arbaraj biotopoj de la Kapuĉa parulio estas fragmentataj.

Referencoj

redakti
  1. Burns (1898)

Literaturo

redakti
  • Evans Ogden, L. J. and B. J. Stutchbury. 1994. Hooded Warbler (Wilsonia citrina). In The Birds of North America, No. 110 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists’ Union.

Informoj

redakti
  • Friesen L & Martin D. (2000). National recovery plan for the Acadian flycatcher, Empidonax virescens, and hooded warbler, Wilsonia citrina. Canadian Research Index. p. n/a.
  • Page AM. (1994). Status report on the hooded warbler, Wilsonia citrina, in Canada. Canadian Research Index. p. n/a.
  • Alcantara JL. Ph.D. (2000). Diversity and spatial analysis of passerine birds in relation to habitat characteristics of woods along the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, United States—Louisiana.
  • Artman VL. Ph.D. (2000). Effects of prescribed burning on forest bird populations in southern Ohio. The Ohio State University, United States—Ohio.
  • Baker MD. Ph.D. (2000). Habitat influences on nongame bird nest success in a managed and fragmented southern pine forest. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, United States—Louisiana.
  • Barrow WC, Jr. Ph.D. (1990). Ecology of small insectivorous birds in a bottomland hardwood forest. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, United States—Louisiana.
  • Bowen LT. Ph.D. (2004). Seasonal relationships between birds and arthropods in bottomland forest canopy gaps. North Carolina State University, United States—North Carolina.
  • Brito-Aguilar R. M.S. (2005). Effects of even-aged forest management on early successional bird species in Missouri Ozark forest. University of Missouri - Columbia, United States—Missouri.
  • Callo PA. Ph.D. (2002). The genetic distribution model of offspring defense and the influence of predator identity on prey response. University of Maryland, College Park, United States—Maryland.
  • DeMeo TE. Ph.D. (1999). Forest songbird abundance and viability at multiple scales on the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. West Virginia University, United States—West Virginia.
  • Evans Ogden LJ. M.Sc. (1994). Cross-seasonal effects on the breeding strategy of the hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina). York University (Canada), Canada.
  • Godard RD. Ph.D. (1991). Individual recognition by migratory songbirds. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States—North Carolina.
  • Kilgo JC. Ph.D. (1996). Breeding bird use of hardwood habitats in the upper coastal plain of South Carolina. University of Georgia, United States—Georgia.
  • Klimstra JD. M.S. (2003). Using banding data to assess the use of 100-meter-wide habitat corridors by breeding landbirds, in an intensively managed pine landscape. North Carolina State University, United States—North Carolina.
  • Moorman CE. Ph.D. (1999). Relationships between artificially created gaps and breeding birds in a southeastern bottomland forest. Clemson University, United States—South Carolina.
  • Neudorf DL. Ph.D. (1996). A dual system of female control of extra-pair copulations in the hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina). York University (Canada), Canada.
  • Niven DK. Ph.D. (1996). A comparison of the ecology and population dynamics of a neotropical migrant landbird, the hooded warbler, in winter and summer. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States—Illinois.
  • Norris DR. M.Sc. (2000). Behavioral response of male hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina) to small, isolated forest fragments. York University (Canada), Canada.
  • Pasher J. M.Sc. (2005). Modelling and mapping potential hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina) habitat using remote sensing. Carleton University (Canada), Canada.
  • Peyman Dove LD. Ph.D. (2000). Landscape metrics to assess habitat suitability for conservation bird species in the southeastern United States. Mississippi State University, United States—Mississippi.
  • Pitcher TE. M.Sc. (1998). Male parental care and extrapair copulation effort in hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina). York University (Canada), Canada.
  • Ramos Olmos MA. Ph.D. (1983). SEASONAL MOVEMENTS OF BIRD POPULATIONS AT A NEOTROPICAL STUDY SITE IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ, MEXICO. University of Minnesota, United States—Minnesota.
  • Revels MR. Ph.D. (1997). Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) parasitism of breeding birds in Arkansas: Ecological relationships and effects on hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina) breeding biology. University of Arkansas, United States—Arkansas.
  • Rush S. M.Sc. (2003). The effects of forest fragmentation on post-fledging survival and dispersal of a forest songbird. York University (Canada), Canada.
  • Sargent RA, Jr. Ph.D. (1996). The nesting ecology of songbirds in the fragmented landscape of South Carolina. University of Georgia, United States—Georgia.
  • Tarof SA. M.Sc. (1996). Does breeding density and forest fragmentation constrain extra-pair matings and nesting success in hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina)?. York University (Canada), Canada.
  • Weeks KC. M.S. (2001). The foraging and nesting ecology of black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens) and hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina) in the southern Appalachians. North Carolina State University, United States—North Carolina.

Artikoloj

redakti
  • Annand EM & Thompson FR, III. (1997). Forest bird response to regeneration practices in central hardwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management. vol 61, no 1. p. 159-171.
  • Artman VL, Sutherland EK & Downhower JF. (2001). Prescribed burning to restore mixed-oak communities in southern Ohio: Effects on breeding-bird populations. Conservation Biology. vol 15, no 5. p. 1423-1434.
  • Baker MD & Lacki MJ. (1997). Short-term changes in bird communities in response to silvicultural prescriptions. Forest Ecology & Management. vol 96, no 1-2. p. 27-36.
  • Bisson IA & Stutchbury BJM. (2000). Nesting success and nest-site selection by a neotropical migrant in a fragmented landscape. Canadian Journal of Zoology. vol 78, no 5. p. 858-863.
  • Brazier FH. (1993). Hooded warbler in regina. Blue Jay. vol 51, no 3.
  • Buehler DM, Norris DR, Stutchbury BJM & Kopysh NC. (2002). Food supply and parental feeding rates of Hooded Warblers in forest fragments. Wilson Bulletin. vol 114, no 1. p. 122-127.
  • Callo PA. (2004). Do predator model presentations affect nesting success?. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 75, no 2. p. 200-202.
  • Conway CJ, Powell GVN & Nichols JD. (1995). Overwinter survival of neotropical migratory birds in early-successional and mature tropical forests. Conservation Biology. vol 9, no 4. p. 855-864.
  • Crawford HS, Hooper RG & Titterington RW. (1981). Song Bird Population Response to Silvicultural Practices in Central Appalachian USA Hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management. vol 45, no 3. p. 680-692.
  • Dix J. (1997). Hooded warbler on St Kilda. Scottish Birds. vol 19, no 2.
  • Donovan TM & Flather CH. (2002). Relationships among North American songbird trends, habitat fragmentation, and landscape occupancy. Ecological Applications. vol 12, no 2. p. 364-374.
  • Etterson MA. (2003). An observation of singing by a female-plumaged Canada Warbler. Southeastern Naturalist. vol 2, no 3. p. 419-422.
  • Fedy BC, Norris DR & Stutchbury BJM. (2002). Do male Hooded Warblers guard their mates when their paternity is most at risk?. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 73, no 4. p. 420-426.
  • Godard R. (1991). Long-Term Memory of Individual Neighbours in a Migratory Songbird. Nature. vol 350, no 6315. p. 228.
  • Godard R. (1993). Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology. vol 33, no 1. p. 45-50.
  • Godard R & Wiley RH. (1995). Individual recognition of song repertoires in two wood warblers. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology. vol 37, no 2. p. 119-123.
  • Greenberg CH & Lanham JD. (2001). Breeding bird assemblages of hurricane-created gaps and adjacent closed canopy forest in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management. vol 154, no 1-2. p. 251-260.
  • Heltzel JM & Leberg PL. (2006). Effects of selective logging on breeding bird communities in bottomland hardwood forests in Louisiana. Journal of Wildlife Management. vol 70, no 5. p. 1416-1424.
  • Hines M. (1999). Managing red-cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) affects breeding-bird communities of pine-oak forests in southeastern Kentucky. Journal of the Kentucky Academy of Science. vol 60, no 2. p. 78-86.
  • Hobson KA & Wassenaar LI. (1997). Linking breeding and wintering grounds of neotropical migrant songbirds using stable hydrogen isotopic analysis of feathers. Oecologia. vol 109, no 1. p. 142-148.
  • Horn DJ & Benninger-Truax M. (1997). The summer bird community in a late-successional beech-maple forest in Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science. vol 97, no 1. p. 14-16.
  • Howlett JS & Stutchbury BJ. (1996). Nest concealment and predation in hooded warblers: Experimental removal of nest cover. Auk. vol 113, no 1. p. 1-9.
  • Howlett JS & Stutchbury BJM. (1997). Within-season dispersal, nest-site modification, and predation in renesting Hooded Warblers. Wilson Bulletin. vol 109, no 4. p. 643-649.
  • Howlett JS & Stutchbury BJM. (2003). Determinants of between-season site, territory, and mate fidelity in Hooded Warblers (Wilsonia citrina). Auk. vol 120, no 2. p. 457-465.
  • Ickes R. (1992). Hooded warbler Wilsonia citrina. Brauning, D. vol W, p. Atlas of breeding birds in Pennsylvania.
  • Kilgo JC. (2005). Harvest-related edge effects on prey availability and foraging of hooded warblers in a bottomland hardwood forest. Condor. vol 107, no 3. p. 627-636.
  • Kilgo JC & Moorman CE. (2003). Patterns of cowbird parasitism in the southern Atlantic coastal plain and piedmont. Wilson Bulletin. vol 115, no 3. p. 277-284.
  • Kilgo JC, Sargent RA, Chapman BR & Miller KV. (1996). Nest-site selection by Hooded Warblers in bottomland hardwoods of South Carolina. Wilson Bulletin. vol 108, no 1. p. 53-60.
  • Lacki MJ, Yacek HF, Jr. & Baker MD. (2004). Nesting success of forest songbirds in mixed mesophytic forests in eastern Kentucky. Journal of the Kentucky Academy of Science. vol 65, no 1. p. 21-26.
  • Lopez Ornat A & Greenberg R. (1990). Sexual Segregation by Habitat in Migratory Warblers in Quintana Roo Mexico. Auk. vol 107, no 3. p. 539-543.
  • Lynch JF, Morton ES & Van Der Voort ME. (1985). Habitat Segregation between the Sexes of Wintering Hooded Warblers Wilsonia-Citrina. Auk. vol 102, no 4. p. 714-721.
  • Mark D & Stutchbury BJ. (1994). Response of a forest-interior songbird to the threat of cowbird parasitism. Animal Behaviour. vol 47, no 2. p. 275-280.
  • Moore F & Kerlinger P. (1987). Stopover and Fat Deposition by North American Wood Warblers Parulinae Following Spring Migration over the Gulf of Mexico. Oecologia. vol 74, no 1. p. 47-54.
  • Moorman CE, Guynn DC, Jr. & Kilgo JC. (2002). Hooded Warbler nesting success adjacent to group-selection and clearcut edges in a southeastern bottomland forest. Condor. vol 104, no 2. p. 366-377.
  • Morton ES. (1989). Female Hooded Warbler Plumage Does Not Become More Male-Like with Age. Wilson Bulletin. vol 101, no 3. p. 460-462.
  • Morton ES. (1990). Habitat Segregation by Sex in the Hooded Warbler Experiments on Proximate Causation and Discussion of Its Evolution. American Naturalist. vol 135, no 3. p. 319-333.
  • Morton ES, Van Der Voort M & Greenberg R. (1993). How a warbler chooses its habitat: Field support for laboratory experiments. Animal Behaviour. vol 46, no 1. p. 47-53.
  • Nagy LR & Smith KG. (1997). Effects of insecticide-induced reduction in lepidopteran larvae on reproductive success of hooded warblers. Auk. vol 114, no 4. p. 619-627.
  • Nagy LR, Smith KG, Lih MP & Stephen FM. (1996). Effects of spraying Bacillus thuringiensis for gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) eradication on the breeding biology of hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina). Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America. p. PART 2) 319, 1996.
  • Neudorf DL & Pitcher TE. (1997). Radio transmitters do not affect nestling feeding rates by female hooded warblers. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 68, no 1. p. 64-68.
  • Neudorf DL, Stutchbury BJM & Piper WH. (1997). Covert extraterritorial behavior of female hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology. vol 8, no 6. p. 595-600.
  • Niven DK. (1993). Male-male nesting behavior in Hooded Warblers. The Wilson Bulletin. vol 105, no 1. p. 190.
  • Norris DR & Stutchbury BJM. (2001). Extraterritorial movements of a forest songbird in a fragmented landscape. Conservation Biology. vol 15, no 3. p. 729-736.
  • Norris DR & Stutchbury BJM. (2002). Sexual differences in gap-crossing ability of a forest songbird in a fragmented landscape revealed through radiotracking. Auk. vol 119, no 2. p. 528-532.
  • Norris DR, Stutchbury BJM & Pitcher TE. (2000). The spatial response of male hooded warblers to edges in isolated fragments. Condor. vol 102, no 3. p. 595-600.
  • Ogden LJE, Neudorf DLH, Pitcher TE & Stutchnury BJM. (2003). Female song in the hooded warbler. Northeastern Naturalist. vol 10, no 4. p. 457-464.
  • Ogden LJE & Stutchbury BJM. (1996). Constraints on double brooding in a neotropical migrant, the hooded warbler. Condor. vol 98, no 4. p. 736-744.
  • Ogden LJE & Stutchbury BJM. (1997). Fledgling care and male parental effort in the hooded warbler (Wilsonia citrina). Canadian Journal of Zoology. vol 75, no 4. p. 576-581.
  • Patten MA & Marantz CA. (1996). Implications of vagrant southeastern vireos and warblers in California. Auk. vol 113, no 4. p. 911-923.
  • Petit KE, Petit DR & Petit LJ. (1988). On Measuring Vegetation Characteristics in Bird Territories Nest Sites Vs. Perch Sites and the Effect of Plot Size. American Midland Naturalist. vol 119, no 1. p. 209-215.
  • Pitcher TE & Stutchbury BJM. (2000). Extraterritorial forays and male parental care in hooded warblers. Animal Behaviour. vol 59, no 6. p. 1261-1269.
  • Robinson WD & Robinson SK. (1999). Effects of selective logging on forest bird populations in a fragmented landscape. Conservation Biology. vol 13, no 1. p. 58-66.
  • Sargent RA, Kilgo JC, Chapman BR & Miller KV. (1997). Nesting success of Kentucky and hooded warblers in bottomland forests of South Carolina. Wilson Bulletin. vol 109, no 2. p. 233-238.
  • Shifley SR, Thompson FR, III, Dijak WD, Larson MA & Millspaugh JJ. (2006). Simulated effects of forest management alternatives on landscape structure and habitat suitability in the Midwestern United States. Forest Ecology & Management. vol 229, no 1-3. p. 361-377.
  • Smith KG. (1977). Distribution of Summer Birds Along a Forest Moisture Gradient in an Ozark Watershed. Ecology. vol 58, no 4. p. 810-819.
  • Stutchbury BJ. (1994). Competition for winter territories in a neotropical migrant: The role of age, sex and color. Auk. vol 111, no 1. p. 63-69.
  • Stutchbury BJ & Howlett JS. (1995). Does male-like coloration of female Hooded Warblers increase nest predation?. Condor. vol 97, no 2. p. 559-564.
  • Stutchbury BJ & Ogden LJE. (1996). Fledgling adoption in hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina): Does extrapair paternity play a role?. The Auk. vol 113, no 1. p. 218.
  • Stutchbury BJ, Rhymer JM & Morton ES. (1994). Extrapair paternity in hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology. vol 5, no 4. p. 384-392.
  • Stutchbury BJM. (1997). Effects of female cowbird removal on reproductive success of hooded warblers. Wilson Bulletin. vol 109, no 1. p. 74-81.
  • Stutchbury BJM. (1998). Extra-pair mating effort of male hooded warblers, Wilsonia citrina. Animal Behaviour. vol 55, no 3. p. 553-561.
  • Stutchbury BJM, Piper WH, Neudorf DL, Tarof SA, Rhymer JM, Fuller G & Fleischer RC. (1997). Correlates of extra-pair fertilization success in hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology. vol 40, no 2. p. 119-126.
  • Stutchbury BJM, Pitcher TE, Norris DR, Tuttle EM & Gonser RA. (2005). Does male extra-territory foray effort affect fertilization success in hooded warblers Wilsonia citrina?. Journal of Avian Biology. vol 36, no 6. p. 471-477.
  • Swanson D. (1992). Hooded warbler record for Union County State Park. South Dakota Bird Notes. vol 44, no 3. p. 63-64.
  • Tarof SA & Stutchbury BJ. (1996). A case of cooperative breeding in the Hooded Warbler. Wilson Bulletin. vol 108, no 2. p. 382-384.
  • Tarof SA, Stutchbury BJ & Bennett GF. (1997). Low infection prevalence of blood parasites in hooded warblers. Journal of Field Ornithology. vol 68, no 1. p. 75-78.
  • Tarof SA, Stutchbury BJM, Piper WH & Fleischer RC. (1998). Does breeding density covary with extra-pair fertilizations in Hooded Warblers?. Journal of Avian Biology. vol 29, no 2. p. 145-154.
  • Tingley MW, Orwig DA, Field R & Motzkin G. (2002). Avian response to removal of a forest dominant: Consequences of hemlock woolly adelgid infestations. Journal of Biogeography. vol 29, no 10-11. p. 1505-1516.
  • Whittam RM, McCracken JD, Francis CM & Gartshore ME. (2002). The effects of selective logging on nest-site selection and productivity of hooded warblers (Wilsonia citrina) in Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology. vol 80, no 4. p. 644-654.
  • Wiley RH. (2005). Individuality in songs of Acadian flycatchers and recognition of neighbours. Animal Behaviour. vol 70, p. 237-247.
  • Wiley RH, Godard R & Thompson AD, Jr. (1994). Use of two singing modes by hooded warblers as adaptations for signalling. Behaviour. vol 129, no 3-4. p. 243-278.

Eksteraj ligiloj

redakti
  NODES
COMMUNITY 1
INTERN 3
Note 1