Keywords
durian peel, pyrolysis, liquid smoke, natural preservatives, TVB, organoleptic quality
This article is included in the Agriculture, Food and Nutrition gateway.
durian peel, pyrolysis, liquid smoke, natural preservatives, TVB, organoleptic quality
An explanation about upper case and lower case letter in the tables have been added. The error bars in the figures have been revised for clarity.
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Maryam Mahmoudzadeh
Indonesia is located at the equator and is rich in abundant plantation produce as well as other natural resources, such as durian. Although seasonal, durian production in Indonesia continues throughout the year. High consumption of durian can lead to environmental issues because there is no proper management of durian peel waste. In general, durian peel contains a high level of cellulose (50–60%), starch (20%) and lignin1, and has the potential to be used as a raw material for production of liquid smoke.
A common method to produce liquid smoke is pyrolysis, in which cellulose, lignin, and starch are processed into various chemical compounds2. This process occurs in various stages: (i) hemicelluloses are disintegrated at 200–315°C, resulting in formation of furan, acetic acid and its derivatives; (ii) cellulose is disintegrated at 240–350°C, resulting in carbonic acid formation; (iii) lignin is disintegrated at 280–500°C, resulting in production of phenol, phenolic ether and its derivatives2. In principle, any wood material can be used in pyrolysis to produce liquid smoke, including palm kernel shells, sugar cane fibers, empty fruit bunches, rice husks, and coconut peel3–10. Previous research11–13 has shown that the liquid smoke produced from pyrolysis of palm kernel shells contained phenol, carbonyl and other acids. These compounds have antimicrobial properties that can help preserve food14–17; they inhibit damaging and spoilage microbes and therefore increase the shelf-life of food products. In addition, liquid smoke can contribute a unique flavor, taste and color to foods. Several researchers have studied the effects of liquid smoke produced from palm kernel shells to preserve mackerel16, fish ball18 and tofu19. However, to our knowledge, there is no research reported on the utilization of durian peel biomass as a natural preservative, despite the wide availability and potential usefulness of durian peel waste.
Fish is a staple food for people living in Indonesia’s coastal and maritime areas. The fish is usually consumed fresh or as processed products. Fish has highly nutritious and beneficial for health, however, it decomposes easily (in approximately 8 hours) due to the activity of spoilage microorganisms. Traditional fishermen use formaldehyde as a preservative to lengthen the storage life, but this compound is dangerous to human health. In recent years because of concern regarding the use of chemical preservatives, there has been much research conducted on natural antimicrobials to prevent microbial growth and food spoilage. One natural alternative is liquid smoke, which contains antimicrobial properties. The application of liquid smoke to preserve fish is simple, can be used repeatedly and has the potential to replace commonly used harmful man-made preservatives. This research aims to study the potential usefulness of liquid smoke resulting from durian peel pyrolysis as a natural mackerel preservative.
Liquid smoke was produced in a pyrolysis reactor as explained in previous research1,16. As much as 3 kg of dried durian peel was placed in the reactor set at 340°C and 380°C. The resulting smoke was condensed to produce tar, charcoal and grade 3 liquid smoke. The next step was distillation at 190°C to separate the liquid smoke from tar, resulting in production of grade 1 liquid smoke. The composition of liquid smoke grade 1 can be found elsewhere1. The liquid smoke grade 1 mainly contains acetic acid, phenol and small amount of other compound such as ketones, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids. While the liquid smoke grade 3 could not be used as preservative because still contain a toxic compound such as tar1. The liquid smoke grade 1 was then used as the preservative by soaking mackerel in different concentrations (0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3%) for 60 hours (untill end of preservation time). The following analysis tests were conducted during storage: measurement of TVB, organoleptic quality, antibacterial activities and total number of bacterial counts. The analyses were conducted every six hours.
TVB-N is a method to determine the freshness of fish based on its spoilage due to microbial growth and loss of fats or proteins20. The TVB-N was determined according the procedure established by Susanto et al. with a slight modfication21. TVB-N measurement was carried out by placing a Conway petri dish sideways with its lid half open inside an incubator at 35°C for 35 minutes. The petri dish contained the liquid smoke used to soak the fish, and K2BO3, and H3BO3 in each partition. After incubation, the dish was covered and shaken, before further incubation at 35°C for 8 hours. Afterwards, 0.1 ml boric acid was exposed to every indicator and left for 2 hours. Titrations with HCl (0.01 N) were performed until the color turned pink.
The organoleptic tests involved examining the samples using the senses of volunteer panelists, including examining the color, smell, taste and texture of the fish meat. These tests were carried out in order to identify how much people liked the liquid smoke preserved mackerel and to determine how long the fish would last. Testing was carried out in compliance with organoleptic testing standard manuals SNI 01-2346-200622. The number of panelists used in this research was 30 people, consisting of 23 non-standard subjects (people who were not trained in performing organoleptic assessment/testing, recruited from the pool of chemical engineering students at Syiah Kuala University) and seven standard subjects (people with high sensitivity towards testing product quality, and possessed knowledge and experience in assessing product quality, recruited from the Health Laboratory, Banda Aceh). The panelists were given briefing and training prior to performing the tests. The resulting values were then processed using hedonic tests.
Average quality value:
Where x = average quality scores, xi = value of organoleptic quality testing; panels i, and n = number of panelists
The statistical analysis of standard deviation was also performed on each data of the organoleptic test results for color, flavor, aroma and texture of fish during storage. For statistical analysis, One-Way ANOVA with Least Significant Different (LSD) test using the SPSS ver.22 for window was used. The authors presented the quantitative data as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normally distributed quantitative data should be summarized as mean. Here, the SD refers to the variation in the values of the variable within the sample. The larger the SD, the greater the variability within the sample.
Flavor testing on fish was carried out after the samples had been steamed (at 90–100°C for 15 min) without changing the flavor. Table 1 describes the scale used to determine the flavor of fish samples.
The antibacterial activity testing was carried out to identify the activity of durian peel liquid smoke against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. The method used was the disk diffusion (Kirby–Bauer) assay, as described by Tendencia23, involving the use of Mueller Hinton (MH) media (Merck, KgaA, Germany), performed by the Health Laboratory (Banda Aceh, Indonesia). This method was chosen because of its simplicity and the ability to see the formation of inhibition zones as clear areas around the antimicrobial disks.
The total bacterial counts of mackerel was determined by Plate Count Agar (PCA) according to Indonesian standard manuals SNI 2897:200824. The analysis was performed by the Health Laboratory (Banda Aceh, Indonesia)
The TVB-N values in fish after being treated with liquid smoke are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The higher the concentration of liquid smoke, the lower the TVB-N value and the greater the antibacterial inhibition produced. The lowest TVB-N value was observed with 3% liquid smoke. Figure 1 shows that the TVB-N values resulting from the use of liquid smoke produced at 340°C at 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3% concentrations were low at 2.814, 1.407, 1.407 and 1.407 mg nitrogen/g (mgN/100g), respectively. In the meantime, liquid smoke produced at 380°C (Figure 2) at the same concentrations resulted in the following TVB-N values: 2.814; 1.407; 1.407 and 0.7035 mgN/100 g within 6 hours. Within 54 hours, the TVB-N values for each soaking time were still within the safe limits allowed. After 60 hours, the TVB-N values increased to levels greater than 33 mgN/100g, which is above the acceptable consumer standard of 30 mgN/100g. These results are comparable to those obtained in previous research16 using liquid smoke from oil palm kernel shells. A TVB-N value of 0–30 mgN/100g in fresh produce signifies good quality in compliance with National Indonesian Standards for food (SNI 01-2729-1992). TVB-N values increase due to a bacterial enzyme which degrades proteins into amino acids, and short peptide bonds resulting in production of a number of bases including, amine, ammonia, and trimethylamine which produce foul odors in foods25. Longer soaking periods will result in greater bacterial activities, which in turn produce more bases and increase TVB-N values16.
Color. Results from organoleptic testing on color of samples showed that mackerel soaked in various concentrations of liquid smoke changed color depending on the soaking duration (Table 2). With 0.5–3% liquid smoke concentrations produced at 340°C pyrolysis, the color changed from pale white to yellowish–cream in 36 hours. The same concentrations for 380°C pyrolysis caused the color to change from pale white to yellowish cream in 42 hours. A food product that has high nutritional value, good flavor and good taste will have little interest from customers if the product does not also have an attractive color. Fish soaked in 0.5–3% liquid smoke produced at 380°C had the most optimum results, probably due to a high content of phenol (1.73 wt.%) and acetic acid (8.51wt.%) compared to that of liquid smoke produced at 340°C (phenol=0.79 wt. % and acetic acid=3.40 wt. %)1, which maintained the freshness of the fish16,19. For comparison, fish samples that did not receive liquid smoke treatment turned a cream color after only 8 hours. Raw data are available on Zenodo26.
Flavor and aroma. The hedonic test results for flavor and aroma are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. High concentrations of liquid smoke slowed down the occurrence of foul smells and bad flavors in mackerel for up to 30 hours (Table 3 and Table 4). With regards to aroma, the use of 2–3% liquid smoke produced at 380°C maintained a desirable aroma for up to 48 hours of soaking, although the aroma grew thick (similar to the smell of liquid smoke). The smoked scent seeped into the mackerel and grew stronger due to a reduced content of acetic acid in the fish. Production of foul odors can also be used to indicate food spoilage caused by oxidation and fat oxidation lead to production of foul odors in fish27. With regards to taste, liquid smoke produced a smoky smell in the fish but without smoke treatment, the deterioration in changes in taste and smell would have occurred in less than 12 hours. Saloko et al.17 stated that the use of 5% liquid smoke in a nanocapsule from chitosan and maltodextrin had the potential to maintain the freshness of mackerel for up to 24 hours.
Texture. Texture tests can be carried out orally as well as by touching with hands aimed at feeling the texture of a food product. Table 5 shows that the best texture of mackerel occurred when 3% liquid smoke produced at 380°C was used for up to 48 hours. The fish texture was still quite chewy up to 42 hours in fish treated with 2–3% liquid smoke produced at 340°C. At both pyrolysis temperatures, the fish texture became rigid after 48 hours. At a low concentration (0.5%), the texture of the fish started to change within 36 hours. The present of acids and phenolic compounds in liquid smoke might affect the flavor, aroma, and texture of the fish16. The change in texture was influenced by the speed of bacterial growth. Fish quality decreased when the texture became tender due to the effects of cathepsin and collagenase enzymes on muscle tissues. Cathepsin in fish degrades protein and causes the meat to become tender, while collagenase degrades polypeptide bonds when protein is not denatured27.
The results of SD calculation showed that a constant reproducibility SD was only obtained at 18 (eighteen) hours of preservation time on the organoleptic test results for color, flavor, aroma and texture of fish during storage. For preservation time from 24 hours until 60 hours, the standard deviation of the organoleptic test results for color, flavor, aroma and texture had fewer and more scattered data ranging of 0.00 to 0.50. These small standard deviation data indicated that generally the all-organoleptic test results are acceptable.
Table 6 shows the effects of liquid smoke on bacterial growth (E. coli and S. aureus). A concentration of 0.5% liquid smoke produced at 340°C did not inhibit bacterial growth; however, bacterial inhibiting properties were shown at a concentration of 1%. The same antibacterial properties were seen in liquid smoke produced at 380°C even at lower concentrations. Kim et al.28 stated that the use of 0.1–1% liquid smoke produced from rice husks inhibited Salmonella growth while Milly et al.29 demonstrated that 1.5–9% liquid smoke produced from cinnamon can also inhibit bacteria. In addition, Saloko et al.17 showed that 5% liquid smoke from chitosan and maltodextrin in a nanocapsule inhibited E. coli and P. fluorescens growth. The type of wood biomass used to produce liquid smoke will result in production of different phenol, carbonyl and acid compounds, which in turn will determine the antibacterial properties, as well as the sensitivity of the pathogenic bacteria to the liquid smoke raw material14.
The total number of bacterial counts in the mackerel will determine whether or not the product is acceptable for human consumption. Plate count agar (PCA) was used to determine the total bacterial counts on mackerel samples. The number of microbes present after soaking must fall within the safe limits for consumption, namely 5×105 colonies/g, in accordance with SNI 02-2725-199230. Table 7 shows that 12 hours of soaking did not result in any significant changes in the number of counts; levels ranged from 3.2×105 to 3.5×105 colonies/g, indicating that the products were considered to be safe. However, after 42 hours the number of colonies increased to levels of 5.02 × 105 colonies/g, making the fish unsafe for human consumption. Liquid smoke can inhibit the growth of bacteria due to the presence of phenols, acids and carbonyl compounds working together to inhibit degradation and spoilage. In particular, acetic acid can penetrate the cell membrane and neutralize the pH gradient31.
Smoke produced from durian peel pyrolysis had inhibitory effects against bacteria even when applied at low concentrations. This showed that the liquid smoke treatment had the potential to be used as a food preservative, especially for fish. The organoleptic tests carried out showed that the preservation of mackerel depended on the concentration and pyrolysis temperature used during the liquid smoke production. At a concentration of 3% liquid smoke produced at 340°C, the fish stayed acceptable for consumption for 42 hours, based on its color (cream), flavor, aroma and texture, and the total bacterial counts were also acceptable and within the safe limits. Meanwhile, TVB-N tests showed that the fish remained of acceptable quality for 54 hours, with a TVB-N value of less than 30 mgN/100g.
Data associated with this study, stratified by table, are available on Zenodo. Data include raw organoleptic test results for the quality of fish and effects of liquid smoke on bacterial counts. Bacterial count data are provided as mean values, since this is the output generated by the external Health Laboratory. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.255648226.
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
The author is grateful to the Syiah Kuala University and the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia for the research funding. Thanks very much to Hera Desvita and A.R Yelvia Sunarti for performing the experiments and analyses.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
F1000Research | - | - |
PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. | - | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Yes
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Yes
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Bioprocess Engineering and Biomanufacturing
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Quality control tests in food science
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Quality control tests in food science
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Quality control tests in food science
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Quality control tests in food science
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Quality control tests in food science
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Partly
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
No
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
No
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Quality control tests in food science
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 6 (revision) 08 Nov 19 | read | read |
Version 5 (revision) 18 Oct 19 | read | |
Version 4 (revision) 06 Sep 19 | read | |
Version 3 (revision) 20 Aug 19 | read | |
Version 2 (revision) 22 Jul 19 | read | |
Version 1 01 Mar 19 | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Already registered? Sign in
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
2. y-axial at Figures has been revised to be clearly identified.
2. y-axial at Figures has been revised to be clearly identified.
2. y-axial at Figures has been revised to be clearly identified.