Rat prefrontal cortical neurons selectively code strategy switches.
Rich EL, Shapiro M
The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009 Jun 03; 29(22):7208-7219
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6068-08.2009PMID: 19494143Multiple memory systems are distinguished by different sets of neuronal circuits and operating principles optimized to solve different problems across mammalian species (Tulving and Schacter, 1994). When a rat selects an arm in a plus maze, for example, the choice can be guided by distinct neural systems (White and Wise, 1999) that encode different relationships among perceived stimuli, actions, and reward. Thus, egocentric or stimulus-response associations require striatal circuits, whereas spatial or episodic learning requires hippocampal circuits (Packard et al., 1989). Although these memory systems function in parallel (Packard and McGaugh, 1996), they can also interact competitively or synergistically (Kim and Ragozzino, 2005). The neuronal mechanisms that coordinate these multiple memory systems are not fully known, but converging evidence suggests that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is central. The PFC is crucial for abstract, rule-guided behavior in primates and for switching rapidly between memory strategies in rats. We now report that rat medial PFC neuronal activity predicts switching between hippocampus- and caudate-dependent memory strategies. Prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) neuronal activity changed as rats switched memory strategies even as the rats performed identical behaviors but did not change when rats learned new contingencies using the same strategy. PL dynamics anticipated learning performance whereas IL lagged, suggesting that the two regions help initiate and establish new strategies, respectively. These neuronal dynamics suggest that the PFC contributes to the coordination of memory strategies by integrating the predictive relationships among stimuli, actions, and reward.
- Rich EL 1,
- Shapiro M
Affiliations
- 1 Fishberg Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA
This work was supported by:
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: MH065658
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: R01 MH073689
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: P50 MH094263
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: R01 MH065658-09
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: MH073689
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: R01 MH073689-05
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: R01 MH065658
NIMH NIH HHS, United States
GrantID: F31 MH077431