Disputatio:Musica

Musica fuit pagina mensis Iunii 2023.

This article has a incorrect structure. It must begin: Musica .........est.........--Daniel bg 10:50, 3 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)

"Musica est ars. . . ." What could be correcter than that?! IacobusAmor 12:27, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

It was fixed in March 2006. The bad structure was before then.--Rafaelgarcia 22:04, 20 Octobris 2007 (UTC)

Imagines

The two depicted Western composers are Liszt & Wagner: not at all a NPOV. Someday, we must work on this. IacobusAmor 12:27, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)

Cantus ... Musica ...

Currently Cantus redirects to Musica. This doesn't seem right. In addition, under "Vide etiam" there is Cantus, which in effect redirects to itself. If a separate article for Cantus ("singing") were written, that would of course solve both problems. LionhardusCiampa 16:28, 20 Octobris 2007 (UTC)

I started a separate article. --UV 21:20, 20 Octobris 2007 (UTC)

Haec removi ...

... e bibliographia. Sed certe oportet bibliographiam multilinguem praebere si possumus, et, si privilegium Angloamericanis datum reperimus, tale privilegium deminuere usque ad aequalitatem! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:04, 12 Maii 2015 (UTC)

(Una ayuda para subdesarollados que quizás no lo comprendrán: conocimiento es algo que solo existe en inglés. Lo mejor de lo que fué escrito sobre música? Todo en inglés -- óbvio. Algo escrito en alguna otra lengua que sea digno de mención? No, nada de nada! Welcome to Wikipedia! Now in Latin!)