Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Palgrave Macmillan

Is-ought Question

  • Book
  • © 1969

Overview

Editors:
  1. W. D. Hudson
    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

Part of the book series: Controversies in Philosophy (COIPHIL)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
CHF34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook CHF 75.50
Price excludes VAT (Switzerland)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Keywords

Table of contents (23 chapters)

  1. Front Matter

    Pages i-10
    Download chapter PDF

  2. Editor’s Introduction: The ‘is-ought’ problem

    1. Editor’s Introduction: The ‘is-ought’ problem

      • W. D. Hudson
      Pages 11-31

  3. The Interpretation of Hume on Is-Ought

    1. Front Matter

      Pages 33-33
      Download chapter PDF

    2. Hume on ‘is’ and ‘ought’

      • A. C. MacIntyre
      Pages 35-50

    3. Hume on ‘is’ and ‘ought’: A reply to Mr MacIntyre

      • R. F. Atkinson
      Pages 51-58

    4. Hume on is and ought

      • Geoffrey Hunter
      Pages 59-63

    5. On the interpretation of Hume

      • Antony Flew
      Pages 64-69

    6. A reply to Professor Flew

      • Geoffrey Hunter
      Pages 70-72

    7. Hume on is and ought

      • W. D. Hudson
      Pages 73-80

  4. An Attempt to Reduce Ought to Is

    1. Front Matter

      Pages 81-81
      Download chapter PDF

    2. The ‘is-ought’: An unnecessary dualism

      • M. Zimmerman
      Pages 83-91

    3. Zimmerman’s ‘is-is’: A schizophrenic monism

      • Kenneth Hanly
      Pages 92-94

    4. A note on the ‘is-ought’ barrier

      • M. Zimmerman
      Pages 95-95

  5. Attempts to derive ought from is

    1. Front Matter

      Pages 97-97
      Download chapter PDF

    2. The gap between ‘is’ and ‘should’

      • Max Black
      Pages 99-113

    3. The possibilities of moral advice

      • D. Z. Phillips
      Pages 114-119

    4. How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’

      • John R. Searle
      Pages 120-134

    5. On not deriving ‘ought’ from ‘is’

      • Antony Flew
      Pages 135-143

    6. The promising game

      • R. M. Hare
      Pages 144-156

    7. On deriving ‘ought’ from ‘is’

      • J. E. McClellan, B. P. Komisar
      Pages 157-162
Back to top

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Back to top

Search

Navigation

  NODES
Note 1