Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess symptomatic and quality of life outcome scores following site specific fascial reattachment surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the validated Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaires. One hundred and ninety two women underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse; ninety four underwent anterior repair (thirty four of them had vaginal hysterectomy), and ninety eight had posterior repair. Patients filled P-QOL questionnaires 24 hours prior to surgery and a postal P-QOL questionnaire six months post operatively. Pre and post operative questionnaires were paired. Quality of life and symptoms scores were calculated using Wilcoxon signed rank test. One hundred and one women returned their questionnaires and were suitable to include in the study. Forty nine underwent anterior repair (fifteen had vaginal hysterectomy) and 52 underwent posterior repair. Quality of life scores showed significant improvement in the anterior and posterior repair groups with the exception of general health in the anterior repair group and general health and prolapse impact in the posterior repair group. Anterior repair significantly improved urinary voiding and storage symptoms. Posterior repair group showed significant improvement in defecatory symptoms. Both groups showed improvement in sexual function and general prolapse symptoms. Prolapse repair with site specific fascial reattachment results in significant improvement in quality of life scores six months after surgery. Anterior repair improves urinary voiding and storage symptoms and posterior repair improves defecatory dysfunction and urinary voiding. Sexual function improves following prolapse repair with site specific fascial reattachment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bump RC, Norton PA (1998) Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25:723–746
Samuelsson EC, Arne Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:299–305
Reid FM, Smith ARB, Dunn G (2007) Which questionnaire? A psychometric evaluation of three patient-based outcome measures used to assess surgery for stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 26:123–128
Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V (2005) The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 112:971–976
Altman D, Zetterström J, López A et al (2005) Functional and anatomical outcome after transvaginal rectocoele repair using collagen mesh: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1233–1242
Thakur R, Stanton S (2002) Management of genital prolapse. BMJ 324:1258–1262
Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith ARB (2005) Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG 112:1134–1138
Kaminski PF, Sorosky JI, Pees RC, Podczaski ES (1993) Correction of massive vaginal prolapse in an older population: a four-year experience at a rural tertiary care center. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:42–44
Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP (1996) Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obst Gynecol 175:612–616
Meschia M, Bruschi F, Amicarelli F, Pifarotti P, Marchini M, Crosignani G (1999) The sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension: critical analysis of outcomes. Int Urogynecol 10:155–159
Young SB, Daman JJ, Bony LG (2001) Vaginal paravaginal repair: one-year outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1360–1367
Lefranc JP, Atallah D, Camatte S, Blondon J (2002) Long term follow up of post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse abdominal repair: a report of 85 cases. J Am Coll Surg 195:352–358
Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) Outcomes after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocoele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1360–1364
Caliha C, Khalid U, Campagna L, Digesu GA, Ajay B, Khullar V (2006) SIS graft for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair—a case-controlled study. Int Urogynecol J 17:492–497
Beck RP, McCormick S, Nordstrom S (1991) A 25-year experience with 519 anterior colporrhaphy procedures. Obstet Gynecol 78:1011–1018
Kahn MA, Stanton SL (1997) Posterior colporrhaphy: its effect on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:82–86
Cundiff GW, Fenner D (2004) Evaluation and treatment of women with rectocoele: focus on associated defecatory and sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 104:1403–1421
Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 16:176–181
Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile. A correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1048–1054
Romanzi LJ, Chaiken DC, Blaives JG (1999) The effect of genital prolapse on voiding. J Urol 161:581–586
Black N, Downs SH (1996) The effectiveness of surgery for stress incontinence in women: a systematic review. J Urol 78:497–510
Nguyen JK, Bhatia NN (2001) Resolution of motor urge incontinence after surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. J Urol 166:2263–2266
Stanton SL, Khalid U, Hilton P, Norton C, Cardozo L (1982) Clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse with and without incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89:459–463
Hextall A, Boos K, Cardozo L, Toozs-Hobson P, Anders K, Khullar V (1998) Videocystourethrography with a ring pessary in situ. A clinically useful preoperative investigation for continent women with urogenital prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 9:205–209
Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (1998) An anatomical and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocoele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1451–1457
Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) The anatomical and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocoele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1535–1539
Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocoele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1360–1364
Glavind K, Madsen H (2000) A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocoele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:145–147
Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WMN (2003) Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 101:320–324
Arnold MW, Stewart WR, Aguilar PS (1990) Rectocoele repair: four years’ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 33:684–687
Mellgren A, Anzen B, Nilsson BY et al (1995) Results of rectocoele repair: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:7–13
Barber MD, Visco AG, Wyman JF, Fantl JA, Bump RC (2002) Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 99:281–289
Weber A, Walters M, Ballard L, Booher D, Piedmonte M (1998) Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1446–1450
Barber M (2007) Questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J 18:461–465
Acknowledgement
Financial support: Astellas (nonrestrictive support).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presentation information: British Society of Urogynaecology Annual Scientific Meeting, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK. November 17th 2006.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fayyad, A.M., Redhead, E., Awan, N. et al. Symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after site-specific fascial reattachment for pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J 19, 191–197 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0424-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0424-7