Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Archive/2013/10

Prozess / Gerichtsverfahren

Items involved: Q1301203Talk, Q8222382Talk Status:     resolved

My German was surpassed by these ones, since they seem the same to me. I hope some German-speaker could determine which one belongs to the rest of the interwikis, given that they share all of them on dewiki. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 05:46, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

according to the two pages Prozess is only for conflicting cases, Verfahren is more general and includes things like land registrations --Akkakk (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

resolved--Oursana (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Q253019/Q502490

Items involved: Q253019Talk, Q502490Talk Status:     resolved

  • Q253019 Quarter (section of a municipality, 17 languages)
  • Q502490 quarter (a subdivision or section of an urban settlement, 2 languages)
  Merged --Pasleim (talk) 13:33, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Jesus

Items involved: Q302Talk, Q51666Talk, Q13588684Talk, Q1284211Talk, Q642420Talk, Q13588125Talk, Q1073301Talk, Q3747518Talk Status:     resolved

This has appeared on admin noiceboard, but I think the result it still needs reviewing. Littledogboy (talk) 12:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Q302 and Q51666 are definitely different (figure and person). What is f. e. in en the difference from the figure to the Q13588684 (historical Jesus)? Q1284211 seems a own topic. Greetings, Conny (talk) 21:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC).
Thanks Conny. I've done that. Would someone French-speaking find a match for fr:Jésus_selon_l'exégèse_contemporaine, please? There is plenty of English articles to choose from... Littledogboy (talk) 11:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Initial findings

Interesting! I just compared the French and English constellation of pages on the historicity of Jesus, with a glance at other interwiki'd languages. My findings so far:

I will now take a few cautious steps to clarify things. — JFG talk 18:35, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Actions taken

Went through all language versions for each item, looking for contradictions. Actions taken:

Cleanup results

As a result of this global ontological cleanup, we can now classify the relevant pages about Jesus in various languages from more generic to more specialised topics:

That's it for today! — JFG talk 13:05, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Ursidae

Items involved: Q11788Talk, Q13416141Talk Status:     resolved

scientific vs vernacular names? --Infovarius (talk) 12:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Items involved: Q2101494Talk, Q70208Talk Status:     resolved

Both items have a link to de-wiki. One article in the de-wiki is about the "municipalities in Switzerland" and the other is more like a Wikipedia disambiguation page for the term "Gemeinde" in Switzerland. My impression is that the links to the de-wiki should be interchanged in the two wikidata items. Please note that the item Q70208 is one of the suggested values for the property P132 (P132) in Switzerland, see [1], section "CH - Schweiz". Therefore, it is heavenly used in subdivision taskforce for Switzerland on the third level of the administrative subdivision. There is also a (short) discussion in German, see [2]. The other (somehow understandable languages for me) look okay. Further, I would suggest to connect pages in doubt to the large cluster as it is already. I have some doubts for Esperanto wikipage; is it connect to the right element? There is also another related page in eo-wiki: https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipoj_de_Svislando.--Zuphilip (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Items involved: Q229Talk, Q644636Talk, Q23681Talk Status:     resolved

interwikis in 229, wikivoyage in 644636. Malarz pl (talk) 11:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Cyprus (Q229) is about the country, while Cyprus (Q644636) is about the island. The links should go in whatever item they describe.
In addition, the Northern part of the island, administered by Turkey, is item Northern Cyprus (Q23681). — JFG talk 17:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
For example, w:en:Cyprus is in Cyprus (Q229) because the opening sentence says "Cyprus is an island country in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea.", while voy:en:Cyprus is in Cyprus (Q644636) because it says "Cyprus is an island in the Mediterranean Sea, south of Turkey." The Anonymouse (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
In voy:en:Cyprus is an information: This article covers only the island's southern territory administered by the Republic of Cyprus. In some other language editions of this article are such sentences too. I think, but I'm not sure, that all editions covers only teritory of the Republic of Cyprus and I think all Wikivoyage sitelinks schold be move from Cyprus (Q644636) to Cyprus (Q229). Malarz pl (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
If that's the case in a particular article, it would be logical to move it to Cyprus (Q229). The Anonymouse (talk) 15:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
I moved most of interwikiwoyage from Q644636 (island) to Q229 (country). All of them heve link do Northern Cyprus wikivoyage or flag or other insignia of Republic of Cyprus. I left only frwikivoyage and hewikivoyage links in Q644636 (island). I'm not sure in those cases. Malarz pl (talk) 08:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Solved the French case on wikivoyage: their main page discusses essentially the Southern part Cyprus (Q229), there is a separate article for Northern Cyprus (Q23681). — JFG talk 17:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Solved the Hebrew wikivoyage case too. — JFG talk 17:16, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q1569167Talk, Q1062345Talk, Q466466Talk Status:     resolved

The game character item holds several articles on the characters in video games that don't agree whether game character is synonymous to player character or if it can also be applied to non-player characters, plus the English page which is a disambiguation page basically pointing to the player character and non-player character articles (plus several subtypes of them, to make it complicated). --YMS (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorted out subclasses. --Wylve (talk) 19:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q523862Talk, Q4087803Talk Status:     resolved

Annunciation disambig. Denhud (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

  Merged --ValterVB (talk) 10:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q6011222Talk, Q4017515Talk Status:     resolved

The two items (en:In Your House 6 and it:WWF In Your House 6) are the same issue. The italian article is basically a translation of the original english article, but the author(s) forgot to edit interwiki links. Can, please, someone merge the two? It seems it happened to all the italian articles named: WWF In Your House # that should be linked to the english In Your House #... Italian articles arrive up to number 16 and, after that, they follow a different naming in line with the correspondent english articles (the total number of the events into it.wiki is 22 I suppose). For what it seems to me all the WWF events are without interwiki link. I hope after this issue some good samaritan could settle all the other articles (good luck!) ;-)

all merged --Robot Monk (talk) 10:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q2202405Talk, Q3667984Talk Status:     resolved

The two items (en:Roman Catholicism in South Africa and it:Chiesa cattolica in Sudafrica) are the same issue. The author(s) forgot to edit interwiki links. Can, please, someone merge the two?

Items involved: Q4118162Talk, Q3460813Talk Status:     resolved

I couldn't interwiki the same article in two languages: en:Thermal bag = fr:Sac isothermique -- 62.147.10.21 08:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

merged --Robot Monk (talk) 09:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q650160Talk, Q589877Talk Status:     resolved

The two items are the same issue. Can, please, someone merge the two?. Thank's in advance. Dorieo (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Items involved: Q6925510Talk, Q9185518Talk Status:     resolved

I updated German label but I was not allowed to shift the German categories. Q6925510 should contain link to de:Kategorie:Widerstand gegen die NS-Besatzung in der Tschechoslowakei (it is concerning the whole Czechoslovakia). The other item containing German de:Kategorie:Tschechischer Widerstand 1939–1945 should be independent w/o interwikis.

Items involved: Q5984223Talk, Q12240123Talk Status:     resolved

Ar article about same person not linked

Items involved: Q6806986Talk, Q9346731Talk Status:     resolved

Items involved: Q6403143Talk, Q6766622Talk Status:     resolved

Same person, Arabic article not linked

Items involved: Q4160514Talk, Q5582441Talk Status:     resolved

name (disambiguation) pages not linked

merged --Robot Monk (talk) 07:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q3565868Talk, Q22667Talk, Q284101Talk Status:     resolved

First two seem to be identical at first sight, but there is a huge confusion on interwikis. In rail transport (Q3565868) all interwikis are actually about Rail transport, but in railway (Q22667) there is a mix of Rail transport articles and railway track articles, while in railway track (Q284101) there is a mix of railway track articles and artciles about rail (I mean a one separate steel rail). English language wiki doesn't have a separate article for a rail (it's only part of Track artcile So could anyone help with this confusion, cause I don't even have an idea what should be done here. Abramesku (talk) 10:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

John Hammond

Items involved: Q324322Talk, Q5679950Talk, Q10307845Talk Status:     resolved

These are all about the same fictive character. Don't know which should be merged to which. There can be even more. --Risukarhi (talk) 23:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Merged. Thanks for reporting. --Stryn (talk) 06:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Items involved: Q1322045Talk, Q12206633Talk Status:     resolved

Ar article not linked with others (plz disregard "Univerise" and "Earth", I don't know why they are appearing)

Items involved: Q7310593Talk, ?Talk Status:     resolved

English Wikipedia describe this as a disambig, while de and sv regard it as an ordinary article with possible subitems. If Enwp insist on naming this a disambig, they should have a separate item. I am not familiar with the disambig-policy on enwp, so I would like to hear somebodys opinion before I split them. -- Lavallentalk(block) 09:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I've deleted the dismabig from the enwiki page, see if someone will disagree... Littledogboy (talk)
Nobody has, (this far) -- Lavallen (talk) 12:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
  NODES
admin 4
Idea 1
idea 1
Note 1