Wikidata:Property proposal/number of home cases
number of home cases
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
Description | number of home cases during a pandemic with self- or mandated quarantine |
---|---|
Data type | Quantity |
Domain | Wikidata:Property proposal/number of home cases |
Allowed values | Non-negative integers (^\d) |
Example 1 | 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes (Q87143769) → 3582 (at 2020-03-26) |
Example 2 | 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Hauts-de-France (Q87144163) → 1854 (at 2020-03-26) |
Example 3 | MISSING |
Robot and gadget jobs | number of cases (P1603), number of deaths (P1120), number of recoveries (P8010),Wikidata:Property proposal/number of clinical tests |
Motivation
editFrance (SpF) will no longer give, from 26 March 2020, the P1603 number of "total cases" (hospitalised + home) by region every day, but probably only once a week.
while waiting France (SpF) only give every day the number of "hospitalized cases" (number of people hospitalized in hospital).
what do I use as a property in "number of cases" P1603 to attach them?
quantity (P1114) with criteria used (P1013) ?
Or do I have to apply for two new properties :
-number of hospitalized cases -number of home cases--Viruscorona2020 (talk) 06:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support--So9q (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment wouldn't the number of home cases the result of number of cases (P1603) minus a propably created property of the number of hospitalized cases? --Mfchris84 (talk) 19:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment (but I guess I slightly Oppose). It is a good idea, but I also believe that number of cases (P1603) + a qualifier suffices. Perhaps just the qualifier of (P642) pointing to the item home care (Q1642542) or similar would be enough to capture such information. TiagoLubiana (talk) 02:55, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mfchris84 and @TiagoLubiana please go to show Q83873593#P1603 thanks--Viruscorona2020 (talk) 05:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Viruscorona2020: I did not get it. What you wanted to show us? TiagoLubiana (talk)
- Comment I'm not really convinced that starting to use restrictive qualifier (Q61719275) on number of cases (P1603) is a good idea, given the weay the other properties for this have been defined. Using number of cases (P1603) is likely to end up giving users incorrectly contextualized data. --- Jura 06:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Jura1: I agree that number of cases (P1603) might get confused and end up being misused. But still on the subject, does this property pass the status for notability? I do not know of sources reporting "home cases". Actually, even official case numbers are not accurate, so perhaps there should be a space for case estimates? number of cases (P1603) nowadays serves both "extimated" and "confirmed" definitions. All these specifics that might be of interest in some cases, but not in others, could be specified in qualifiers. Otherwise we could have a lot of different properties, and I am not sure which one is best. I personally think that the qualifier-based might be more flexible. TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Jura (je traduirai en anglais dès que j'aurais du temps) : oui, si j'ai demandé le "home cases", c'est parce que les sources données par SpF gvt parlent de "retour à domicile" et "retour à la maison" que j'ai traduit en "home cases" peut-être improprement, mais on peut changer en "back to home cases" ou autre. Mais bon, au jour d'aujourd'hui leurs données sont placés dans la propriété "nombre de guérisons" car Jérôme Salomon et Olivier Verlant décrivent le plus souvent les chiffres de rad avec le terme de guérison, alors que certains patients sont rentrés chez eux finir de guérir. --Viruscorona2020 (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Jura1: I agree that number of cases (P1603) might get confused and end up being misused. But still on the subject, does this property pass the status for notability? I do not know of sources reporting "home cases". Actually, even official case numbers are not accurate, so perhaps there should be a space for case estimates? number of cases (P1603) nowadays serves both "extimated" and "confirmed" definitions. All these specifics that might be of interest in some cases, but not in others, could be specified in qualifiers. Otherwise we could have a lot of different properties, and I am not sure which one is best. I personally think that the qualifier-based might be more flexible. TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Mfchris84 and @TiagoLubiana please go to show Q83873593#P1603 thanks--Viruscorona2020 (talk) 05:46, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Nepalicoi (talk) 13:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject COVID-19
- Given the lack of support, I'd close this as not done. BTW "number of quarantined cases" separately might be interesting.--- Jura 15:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
@Antidote2020: --- Jura 15:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Viruscorona2020, So9q, Mfchris84, TiagoLubiana, Jura1, Nepalicoi: Not done Stale proposal, insufficient support. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)