Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1998 Aug;149(4):2099–2104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.4.2099

Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data.

H A Orr 1
PMCID: PMC1460271  PMID: 9691061

Abstract

Evolutionary biologists have long sought a way to determine whether a phenotypic difference between two taxa was caused by natural selection or random genetic drift. Here I argue that data from quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses can be used to test the null hypothesis of neutral phenotypic evolution. I propose a sign test that compares the observed number of plus and minus alleles in the "high line" with that expected under neutrality, conditioning on the known phenotypic difference between the taxa. Rejection of the null hypothesis implies a role for directional natural selection. This test is applicable to any character in any organism in which QTL analysis can be performed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coyne J. A. Genetics of a difference in male cuticular hydrocarbons between two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1689–1698. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laurie C. C., True J. R., Liu J., Mercer J. M. An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):339–348. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Paterson A. H., Damon S., Hewitt J. D., Zamir D., Rabinowitch H. D., Lincoln S. E., Lander E. S., Tanksley S. D. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics. 1991 Jan;127(1):181–197. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zeng Z. B. Correcting the bias of Wright's estimates of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character: a further improved method. Genetics. 1992 Aug;131(4):987–1001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.4.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES

  NODES
twitter 2