Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):4179–4187. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08603.x

An abundant U6 snRNP found in germ cells and embryos of Xenopus laevis.

J Hamm 1, I W Mattaj 1
PMCID: PMC401610  PMID: 2531660

Abstract

The particle state of U snRNPs was analyzed in oocytes, eggs, embryos and testes from Xenopus laevis. In each case both the relative abundance and the composition of some U snRNPs were found to differ from that of somatic cells. U2 and U6 snRNPs were the most prominent U snRNPs in germ cells and early embryos. In particular, the concentration of U6 snRNA was 10-20 times higher than that of U4 snRNA. Most of the U6 snRNA was not associated with U4 snRNA and migrated on sucrose gradients as a U6 snRNP. The structure of this novel U snRNP was analyzed. A single protein of 50 kd was copurified with U6 snRNPs by a combination of gradient fractionation, immunodepletion with anti-Sm antibodies and immunoprecipitation with anti-6-methyl adenosine antibodies. Although the U6 snRNP did not contain Sm proteins it migrated into the nucleus when U6 snRNA was injected into the cytoplasm of oocytes. Two U6 snRNA elements have been identified. The first is essential for nuclear migration in oocytes, but not for the formation of U4/6 snRNPs in vitro and might be the binding site of a U6-specific protein. The second element was required for interaction with U4 snRNPs but not for nuclear _targeting.

Full text

PDF
4179

Images in this article

4180Image
on p.4180
4181Image
on p.4181
4182Image
on p.4182
4182Image
on p.4182
4183Image
on p.4183
4184Image
on p.4184

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bach M., Winkelmann G., Lührmann R. 20S small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U5 shows a surprisingly complex protein composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6038–6042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black D. L., Steitz J. A. Pre-mRNA splicing in vitro requires intact U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein. Cell. 1986 Aug 29;46(5):697–704. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90345-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bringmann P., Appel B., Rinke J., Reuter R., Theissen H., Lührmann R. Evidence for the existence of snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex and for their association by intermolecular base pairing. EMBO J. 1984 Jun;3(6):1357–1363. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01977.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bringmann P., Lührmann R. Antibodies specific for N6-methyladenosine react with intact snRNPs U2 and U4/U6. FEBS Lett. 1987 Mar 23;213(2):309–315. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81512-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brow D. A., Guthrie C. Spliceosomal RNA U6 is remarkably conserved from yeast to mammals. Nature. 1988 Jul 21;334(6179):213–218. doi: 10.1038/334213a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carbon P., Murgo S., Ebel J. P., Krol A., Tebb G., Mattaj L. W. A common octamer motif binding protein is involved in the transcription of U6 snRNA by RNA polymerase III and U2 snRNA by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1987 Oct 9;51(1):71–79. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng S. C., Abelson J. Spliceosome assembly in yeast. Genes Dev. 1987 Nov;1(9):1014–1027. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.9.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Robertis E. M., Lienhard S., Parisot R. F. Intracellular transport of microinjected 5S and small nuclear RNAs. Nature. 1982 Feb 18;295(5850):572–577. doi: 10.1038/295572a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dignam J. D., Lebovitz R. M., Roeder R. G. Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Mar 11;11(5):1475–1489. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.5.1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doetschman T. C., Eistetter H., Katz M., Schmidt W., Kemler R. The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Jun;87:27–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Forbes D. J., Kirschner M. W., Caput D., Dahlberg J. E., Lund E. Differential expression of multiple U1 small nuclear RNAs in oocytes and embryos of Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1984 Oct;38(3):681–689. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90263-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guthrie C., Patterson B. Spliceosomal snRNAs. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:387–419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Habets W. J., Sillekens P. T., Hoet M. H., McAllister G., Lerner M. R., van Venrooij W. J. Small nuclear RNA-associated proteins are immunologically related as revealed by mapping of autoimmune reactive B-cell epitopes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(12):4674–4678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Habets W., Hoet M., Bringmann P., Lührmann R., van Venrooij W. Autoantibodies to ribonucleoprotein particles containing U2 small nuclear RNA. EMBO J. 1985 Jun;4(6):1545–1550. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03815.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamm J., Dathan N. A., Mattaj I. W. Functional analysis of mutant Xenopus U2 snRNAs. Cell. 1989 Oct 6;59(1):159–169. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90878-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamm J., Kazmaier M., Mattaj I. W. In vitro assembly of U1 snRNPs. EMBO J. 1987 Nov;6(11):3479–3485. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02672.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hashimoto C., Steitz J. A. U4 and U6 RNAs coexist in a single small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Apr 11;12(7):3283–3293. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.7.3283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lamond A. I., Konarska M. M., Grabowski P. J., Sharp P. A. Spliceosome assembly involves the binding and release of U4 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):411–415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.2.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leff S. E., Rosenfeld M. G., Evans R. M. Complex transcriptional units: diversity in gene expression by alternative RNA processing. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:1091–1117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lerner E. A., Lerner M. R., Janeway C. A., Jr, Steitz J. A. Monoclonal antibodies to nucleic acid-containing cellular constituents: probes for molecular biology and autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2737–2741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lossky M., Anderson G. J., Jackson S. P., Beggs J. Identification of a yeast snRNP protein and detection of snRNP-snRNP interactions. Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):1019–1026. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90588-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lund E., Bostock C. J., Dahlberg J. E. The transcription of Xenopus laevis embryonic U1 snRNA genes changes when oocytes mature into eggs. Genes Dev. 1987 Mar;1(1):47–56. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lund E., Dahlberg J. E. Differential accumulation of U1 and U4 small nuclear RNAs during Xenopus development. Genes Dev. 1987 Mar;1(1):39–46. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lund E., Kahan B., Dahlberg J. E. Differential control of U1 small nuclear RNA expression during mouse development. Science. 1985 Sep 20;229(4719):1271–1274. doi: 10.1126/science.2412294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mattaj I. W. Cap trimethylation of U snRNA is cytoplasmic and dependent on U snRNP protein binding. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):905–911. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mattaj I. W., Hamm J. Regulated splicing in early development and stage-specific U snRNPs. Development. 1989 Feb;105(2):183–189. doi: 10.1242/dev.105.2.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell. 1982 Oct;30(3):675–686. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Noble J. C., Pan Z. Q., Prives C., Manley J. L. Splicing of SV40 early pre-mRNA to large T and small t mRNAs utilizes different patterns of lariat branch sites. Cell. 1987 Jul 17;50(2):227–236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Parker R., Siliciano P. G., Guthrie C. Recognition of the TACTAAC box during mRNA splicing in yeast involves base pairing to the U2-like snRNA. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):229–239. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90564-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pikielny C. W., Bindereif A., Green M. R. In vitro reconstitution of snRNPs: a reconstituted U4/U6 snRNP participates in splicing complex formation. Genes Dev. 1989 Apr;3(4):479–487. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.4.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pikielny C. W., Rymond B. C., Rosbash M. Electrophoresis of ribonucleoproteins reveals an ordered assembly pathway of yeast splicing complexes. 1986 Nov 27-Dec 3Nature. 324(6095):341–345. doi: 10.1038/324341a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rinke J., Appel B., Digweed M., Lührmann R. Localization of a base-paired interaction between small nuclear RNAs U4 and U6 in intact U4/U6 ribonucleoprotein particles by psoralen cross-linking. J Mol Biol. 1985 Oct 20;185(4):721–731. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90057-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rinke J., Steitz J. A. Association of the lupus antigen La with a subset of U6 snRNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Apr 11;13(7):2617–2629. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.7.2617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhuang Y., Weiner A. M. A compensatory base change in U1 snRNA suppresses a 5' splice site mutation. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):827–835. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zieve G. W., Sauterer R. A., Feeney R. J. Newly synthesized small nuclear RNAs appear transiently in the cytoplasm. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jan 20;199(2):259–267. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90312-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES

  NODES
Association 2
twitter 2