Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2018 Aug 13;50(9):1219–1224. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0183-z

Table 1.

GPS derivation and testing for five common, complex diseases

Disease Discovery
GWAS
n )
Prevalence
in validation
dataset
Prevalence
in testing
dataset
Polymorphisms
in GPS
Tuning parameter AUC
(95% CI)
in
validation
dataset
AUC
(95% CI) in
testing
dataset
CAD 60,801 cases; 123,504 controls16 3,963/120,280 (3.4%) 8,676/288,978 (3.0%) 6,630,150 LDPred (ρ = 0.001) 0.81 (0.80–0.81) 0.81 (0.81–0.81)
Atrial
fibrillation
17,931 cases; 115,142 controls30 2,024/120,280 (1.7%) 4,576/288,978 (1.6%) 6,730,541 LDPred (ρ = 0.003) 0.77 (0.76–0.78) 0.77 (0.76–0.77)
Type 2
diabetes
26,676 cases; 132,532 controls31 2,785/120,280 (2.4%) 5,853/288,978 (2.0%) 6,917,436 LDPred (ρ = 0.01) 0.72 (0.72–0.73) 0.73 (0.72–0.73)
Inflammatory
bowel
disease
12,882 cases; 21,770 controls32 1,360/120,280 (1.1%) 3,102/288,978 (1.1%) 6,907,112 LDPred (ρ = 0.1) 0.63 (0.62–0.65) 0.63 (0.62–0.64)
Breast
cancer
122,977 cases; 105,974 controls33 2,576/63,347 (4.1%) 6,586/157,895 (4.2%) 5,218 Pruning and thresholding (r/2 < 0.2; P < 5 × 10−4) 0.68 (0.67–0.69) 0.69 (0.68–0.69)

AUC was determined using a logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, genotyping array, and the first four principal components of ancestry. The breast cancer analysis was restricted to female participants. For the LDPred algorithm, the tuning parameter ρ reflects the proportion of polymorphisms assumed to be causal for the disease. For the pruning and thresholding strategy, r2 reflects the degree of independence from other variants in the linkage disequilibrium reference panel, and P reflects the P value noted for a given variant in the discovery GWAS. CI, confidence interval.

  NODES
Note 1
USERS 1