PMC full text:
Published online 2024 Feb 28. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01388-5
Table 3
Training monitoring parameters | Results |
---|---|
Offered sessions (n) Training monitoring parameters | 61 Results |
Conducted sessions (n) | 47a |
Adherence rate per person | 80% ± 25% (25%-100%)a |
Sessions per patient (mean ± SD, range) | 4,7 ± 2,8 (1-8) |
Days from inclusion to study until dismissal (mean ± SD, range) | 18,7 ± 13,4 (2-50) |
Type of exercise | |
Moderate ET (n) | 29 |
Intensive ET (n) | 9 |
Moderate RT (n) | 10 |
Intensive RT (n) | 1 |
Session according to the plan (n, %) | 23 (49%) |
Session not according to the plan (n, %) | 24 (51%) |
ET (n, % like protocol) | 38a (39.5%) |
Gait training (n, % like protocol) | 28 (28.5%) |
Hand crank ergometer (n, % like protocol) | 10 (70%) |
Bicycle ergometer (n) | 0 |
RT (n, % like protocol) | 11a (73%) |
Used weights | 1kg-4kg |
Used other material | Elastic band, easy loop band, stepper, body weight, |
Not used | 5-10kg weights, stronger loop bands, sling-trainer |
Reasons for no training | |
Weekend/ holiday (n) | 32 |
Medical reasons (pain, dizziness, weakness, nausea) (n) | 9 |
Not met by physiotherapist (n) | 4 |
Physiotherapist in holiday or sick (n) | 3 |
Need of rest (n) | 5 |
Other (n) | 5 |
a2 patients requested to perform both ET and RT in 1 training session and 1 patient trained once additionally voluntarily without a physiotherapist. For that reason, numbers differ between conducted sessions and the number of performed ETs and RTs
Abbreviations: ET Endurance Training, RT Resistance Training