A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome
- PMID: 10051081
- DOI: 10.1007/s001340050789
A prospective randomized comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation and very early high frequency oscillatory ventilation in extremely premature newborns with respiratory distress syndrome
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of very early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in treatment of the respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and to evaluate their impact on the incidence of chronic pulmonary disease and early and late morbidity of very low-birthweight neonates.
Design: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
Setting: Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in the Perinatology Center in Prague.
Patients: 43 premature newborns, delivered in the Department of Obstetrics in the Perinatology Center, were randomly divided into two groups (HFOV and CMV) immediately after delivery; 2 patients in each group died, 2 fulfilled crossover criteria from CMV to HFOV, and 2 were excluded because of congenital malformations. Nineteen patients treated with HFOV were therefore compared with 18 infants in the CMV group.
Methods: The two contrasting modes of ventilation were introduced immediately after intubation. Maintenance of optimal lung volume in HFOV to optimize oxygenation and the therapeutic administration of surfactant after fulfilling defined criteria are important points of the strategy and design of the study.
Measurements and main results: Except for a higher proportion of males in the HFOV group (p<0.02), the basic clinical characteristics (gestational age, birthweight, Apgar score at 5 min, umbilical arterial pH), the two groups were similar. In the acute stage of RDS, infants treated with HFOV had higher proximal airway distending pressure with HFOV for 6 h after delivery (p<0.05). For a period of 12 h after delivery lower values for the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (p<0.03) were noted. The number of patients who did not require surfactant treatment was higher in the HFOV group (11 vs. 1, p<0.001). In the HFOV group the authors found a lower roentgenographic score at 30 days of age (p<0.03) and a lower clinical score in the 36th postconceptional week (p<0.05), using these two scoring systems for assessing chronic lung disease according to Toce scale. The incidence of pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, intraventricular hemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity in both groups was the same.
Conclusions: HFOV, when applied early and when the clinical strategy of maintenance of optimal lung volume is used, improves oxygenation in the acute stage of RDS, reduces the need of surfactant administration, and can decrease the injury to lung tissue even in extremely immature newborns to whom surfactant is administered therapeutically.
Similar articles
-
Early versus delayed surfactant administration in extremely premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome ventilated by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.Intensive Care Med. 2002 Oct;28(10):1483-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1440-1. Epub 2002 Aug 30. Intensive Care Med. 2002. PMID: 12373475 Clinical Trial.
-
The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1044-57. Pediatrics. 1996. PMID: 8951252 Clinical Trial.
-
Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;2015(3):CD000104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25785789 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD000104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;(3):CD000104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub4 PMID: 19588317 Updated. Review.
-
Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants.Neonatology. 2013;103(1):7-8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1159/000338553. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Neonatology. 2013. PMID: 23037971 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of High Frequency Positive Pressure Mechanical Ventilation (HFPPV) With Conventional Method in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Failure.Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Mar;15(3):183-6. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.2791. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013. PMID: 23983995 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of different mean airway pressure settings during high-frequency oscillation in inflammatory response to oleic acid-induced lung injury in rabbits.J Inflamm Res. 2009;2:21-8. doi: 10.2147/jir.s4491. Epub 2009 Mar 16. J Inflamm Res. 2009. PMID: 22096349 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of changes in oscillatory amplitude on PaCO(2) and PaO(2) during high frequency oscillatory ventilation.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 May;82(3):F237-42. doi: 10.1136/fn.82.3.f237. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000. PMID: 10794794 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to Reduce Severe Brain Injury Risk in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e237473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7473. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37052920 Free PMC article.
-
ICU cornerstone: high frequency ventilation is here to stay.Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):342-4. doi: 10.1186/cc2327. Epub 2003 Jul 2. Crit Care. 2003. PMID: 12974963 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources