Angiogenesis during mandibular distraction osteogenesis
- PMID: 10340853
- DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199905000-00002
Angiogenesis during mandibular distraction osteogenesis
Abstract
Recruitment of a blood supply is critical for successful bone induction and fracture healing. Despite the clinical success of distraction osteogenesis (DO), an analysis of angiogenesis during membranous bone DO has not been performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temporal and spatial pattern of angiogenesis during mandibular DO. The right hemimandible of adult male rats was osteotomized, and a customized distraction device was applied. Following a 3-day latency period, distraction was begun at a rate of 0.25 mm twice daily for 6 days (3.0 mm total; 12% increase in mandibular length). Three animals each were sacrificed on days 2, 4, and 6 of distraction (D1, D2, and D3 respectively), or after 1, 2, or 4 weeks of consolidation (C1, C2, and C3 respectively). Two experienced pathologists reviewed the regenerate histology, and angiogenesis was assessed by counting the number of blood vessels per intermediate-power field (IPF). Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance, with p < or = 0.05 considered significant. Results demonstrate that mandibular DO was associated with an intense vascular response during the early stages of distraction (D1). On average, 31.5+/-7.9 vessels were noted in each IPF examined during this time point. The number of blood vessels in the distraction regenerate decreased significantly during the later distraction time points, with approximately 14.0+/-2.0 and 14.7+/-3.5 blood vessels per IPF in sections obtained after days 4 and 6 of distraction (D2, D3) respectively. However, blood vessels at these time points took on a more mature histological pattern. During the consolidation period, the number of blood vessels noted in the regenerate decreased with 8.0+/-2.6, 9.3+/-2.1, and 4.0+/-2.0 vessels per IPF in sections obtained after 1, 2, or 4 weeks of consolidation (C1, C2, C3) respectively (p < 0.05 compared with vessel counts during the earliest distraction time point). This study demonstrates for the first time that an intense vascular response associated with mandibular DO occurs primarily during the early stages of distraction. The authors hypothesize that as distraction continues, newly formed vessels likely undergo consolidation, thus forming more mature vessels capable of withstanding distraction forces. Future studies will assess the effects of therapeutic interventions designed to increase angiogenesis during DO on bony regenerate formation.
Similar articles
-
Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: II. Molecular analysis of transforming growth factor beta-1 and osteocalcin gene expression.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Feb;103(2):536-47. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00026. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999. PMID: 9950542
-
Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response.J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Mar;12(2):175-82. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200103000-00015. J Craniofac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11314629
-
Deferoxamine enhances the vascular response of bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Apr;129(4):850-856. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824422f2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22456357 Free PMC article.
-
H Vessel Formation as a Marker for Enhanced Bone Healing in Irradiated Distraction Osteogenesis.Semin Plast Surg. 2024 Jan 19;38(1):31-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1778039. eCollection 2024 Feb. Semin Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38495069 Review.
-
Latency phase in mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review in animal models.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;59(9):993-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.12.012. Epub 2021 Sep 14. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34531073 Review.
Cited by
-
Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Reconstruction of Condyle: Use of a 3D Model for Vector Planning.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Sep;17(3):276-280. doi: 10.1007/s12663-017-1055-2. Epub 2017 Nov 18. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018. PMID: 30034143 Free PMC article.
-
Cytotoxic agents are detrimental to bone formed by distraction osteogenesis.Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2013 Nov;8(3):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s11751-013-0179-2. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2013. PMID: 24105429 Free PMC article.
-
Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.Odontology. 2009 Jul;97(2):63-75. doi: 10.1007/s10266-009-0101-z. Epub 2009 Jul 29. Odontology. 2009. PMID: 19639448 Review.
-
Vascular analysis as a proxy for mechanostransduction response in an isogenic, irradiated murine model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.Microvasc Res. 2014 Sep;95:143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Microvasc Res. 2014. PMID: 25173587 Free PMC article.
-
Application of VEGFA and FGF-9 enhances angiogenesis, osteogenesis and bone remodeling in type 2 diabetic long bone regeneration.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 5;10(3):e0118823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118823. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25742620 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous