Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project
- PMID: 11320028
- DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00554-1
Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project
Abstract
Purpose: To study the cause-specific prevalence of eye diseases causing bilateral visual impairment in Australian adults.
Design: Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study.
Participants: Participants were aged 40 years and older and resident in their homes at the time of recruitment for the study. The study was conducted during 1992 through 1996.
Methods: The study uses a cluster stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban, and rural Victoria. Participants completed a standardized interview and eye examination, including presenting and best-corrected visual acuity, visual fields, and dilated ocular examination. The major cause of vision loss was identified for all participants found to be visually impaired. Population-based prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect the age and gender distribution of the two cohorts in Victoria.
Main outcome measures: Visual impairment was defined by four levels of severity on the basis of best-corrected visual acuity or visual field: <6/18 > or =6/60 and/or <20 degrees > or =10 degrees radius field, moderate vision impairment; severe vision impairment, <6/60 > or =3/60 and/or <10 degrees > or =5 degrees radius field; and profound vision impairment <3/60 and/or <5 degrees radius field. In addition, less-than-legal driving vision, <6/12 > or =6/18, and/or homonymous hemianopia were defined as mild vision impairment. In Australia, legal blindness includes severe and profound vision impairment.
Results: The population-weighted prevalence of diseases causing less-than-legal driving or worse impairment in the better eye was 42.48/1000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.11, 54.86). Uncorrected refractive error was the most frequent cause of bilateral vision impairment, 24.68/1000 (95% CI, 16.12, 33.25), followed by age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 3.86/1000 (95% CI, 2.17, 5.55); other retinal diseases, 2.91/1000 (95% CI, 0.74, 5.08); other disorders, 2.80/1000 (95% CI, 1.17, 4.43); cataract, 2.57/1000 (95% CI, 1.38, 3.76); glaucoma, 2.32/1000 (95% CI, 0.72, 3.92); neuro-ophthalmic disorders, 1.80/1000 (95% CI, 0, 4.11); and diabetic retinopathy, 1.53/1000 (95% CI, 0.71, 2.36). The prevalence of legal blindness was 5.30/1000 (95% CI, 3.24, 7.36). Although not significantly different, the causes of legal blindness were uncorrected refractive errors, AMD, glaucoma, other retinal conditions, and other diseases.
Conclusions: Significant reduction of visual impairment may be attained with the application of current knowledge in refractive errors, diabetes mellitus, cataract, and glaucoma. Although easily preventable, uncorrected refractive error remains a major cause of vision impairment.
Similar articles
-
Five-year incidence of bilateral cause-specific visual impairment in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5075-81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0457. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003. PMID: 14638700
-
Age-specific causes of bilateral visual impairment.Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Feb;118(2):264-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.2.264. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000. PMID: 10676793 Clinical Trial.
-
Burden of moderate visual impairment in an urban population in southern India.Ophthalmology. 1999 Mar;106(3):497-504. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90107-0. Ophthalmology. 1999. PMID: 10080205
-
Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Lancet Glob Health. 2017. PMID: 29032195 Review.
-
Epidemiology of Ocular Functions and Diseases in Persons With Diabetes.In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, Cissell MA, Eberhardt MS, Meigs JB, Gregg EW, Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Becker DJ, Brancati FL, Boyko EJ, Herman WH, Howard BV, Narayan KMV, Rewers M, Fradkin JE, editors. Diabetes in America. 3rd edition. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US); 2018 Aug. CHAPTER 21. In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, Cissell MA, Eberhardt MS, Meigs JB, Gregg EW, Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Becker DJ, Brancati FL, Boyko EJ, Herman WH, Howard BV, Narayan KMV, Rewers M, Fradkin JE, editors. Diabetes in America. 3rd edition. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US); 2018 Aug. CHAPTER 21. PMID: 33651534 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in an urban population: The Chennai Glaucoma Study.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;62(4):477-81. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.111186. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 23619490 Free PMC article.
-
The relation between visual acuity, fixation stability, and the size and location of foveal hard exudates after photocoagulation for diabetic maculopathy: a 1-year follow-up study.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;241(6):458-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0661-5. Epub 2003 May 15. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003. PMID: 12756576
-
Socioeconomic status and blindness.Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;85(12):1484-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.12.1484. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. PMID: 11734525 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
The prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Tehran: the Tehran Eye Study.Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun;88(6):740-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.031153. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004. PMID: 15148203 Free PMC article.
-
Familial aggregation of hyperopia in an elderly population of siblings in Salisbury, Maryland.Ophthalmology. 2005 Jan;112(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.026. Ophthalmology. 2005. PMID: 15629824 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical