Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;144(4):568-76.
doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.124398.

Arterial elastance and heart-arterial coupling in aortic regurgitation are determined by aortic leak severity

Patrick Segers  1 , Philippe Morimont, Philippe Kolh, Nikos Stergiopulos, Nico Westerhof, Pascal Verdonck
Affiliations
Free article

Arterial elastance and heart-arterial coupling in aortic regurgitation are determined by aortic leak severity

Patrick Segers et al. Am Heart J. 2002 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Background: In aortic valve regurgitation (AR), aortic leak severity modulates left ventricle (LV) arterial system interaction. The aim of this study was to assess (1) how arterial elastance (E(a)), calculated as the ratio of LV end-systolic pressure and stroke volume, relates to arterial properties and leak severity and (2) the validity of E(a)/E(max) (with E(max) the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation) as a heart-arterial coupling parameter in AR.

Methods and results: Our work is based on human data obtained from a study on vascular adaptation in chronic AR. These data allowed us to assess the parameters of a computer model of heart-arterial interaction. In particular, total peripheral resistance (R) and aortic leak severity--expressed as leak resistance (R(L,ao))--were quantified for different patient subgroups (group I/IIa/IIb: E(max) = 2.15/0.62/0.47 mm Hg/mL; E(a) = 1.24/0.66/0.90 mm Hg/mL; R = 1.9/0.6/0.85 mm Hg.s/mL, R(L,ao) = 0.35/0.05/0.20 mm Hg.s/mL). A parameter study demonstrated that R(L,ao) was the main determinant of E(a). With all other parameters constant, valve repair would increase E(a) to 2.81, 1.08, and 1.54 mm Hg/mL in groups I, IIa, and IIb, respectively. For a given E(a)/E(max), LV pump efficiency (estimated as the ratio of stroke work and LV systolic pressure-volume area) was lower than the theoretical predicted value, except for the simulations with intact aortic valve.

Conclusions: In AR, E(a) is determined by aortic leak severity rather than by arterial system properties. Using E(a)/E(max) as a coupling parameter in general or as a mechanico-energetic regulatory parameter in particular is questionable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

  NODES
twitter 2